Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ravishyam Bangalore/Archive

29 September 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Has the same interest as the master, ie, Aadhaar. If you notice their first edit, it was to Ravishyam's talk page maybe trying to masquerade everyone with this new account. I also believe, that Ravishyam should've been indeffed long back. Repeated reports at ANI have been futile and no one has even commented on them and a report to WP:AIV was rejected. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:32, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * @Ponyo: While I do agree that there is very little behavioral evidence, the behavior of Ipoll7, is as such suspicious. The first question, how did Ipoll7 correctly land on Ravishyam's talk page (which is Ipoll7's first edit) especially at a time when Ravi's edits were highly objected and reverted by multiple users? Secondly, this user shows a lot of interest in removing the current redirect from Aadhaar and restore the same POV pushy content that Ravi has been disruptively restoring. In cases where behaviour mught show a deviation, I believe that CU should clear that doubt. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 09:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There's simply not enough evidence to run a check here. I don't see why Ravishyam Bangalore would create a sock account to make an edit request via the talk page when they could just edit the page with their main account. If additional evidence arises, please open a new report.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * , although IPoll7's first edit was to Ravishyam Bangalore's talk page, if I'm reading the message correctly it is an attempt to get Ravishyam Bangalore to stop editing disruptively and trying to convince them that their current tactics at Aadhaar are doing more harm than good. That being said, as there have been suspicions of socking before by Ravishyam Bangalore and there was a possibility that this was a good hand/bad hand situation, I ran a very simple check on the account that shows the two are ❌.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  15:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)