Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

was blocked for harassing edits on Chaos magic, similar to this edit by this IP. The IP editor continues making harassing edits by following me to other articles and adding egregious citation requests. Skyerise (talk) 05:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Here's another harassing edit. Skyerise (talk) 05:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

starts editing immediately after the IP is blocked. Skyerise (talk) 06:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

And the account was created half an hour after Raxythecat was blocked. Skyerise (talk) 06:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ Doug Weller  talk 07:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User appears to be a sysadmin with access to an entire /8 network, 107.xxx.xxx.xxx. It's easy enough to follow their trail.


 * 107.202.75.102 first edited on 14 July 2021, and continued to vandalize the article on 15 July and 21 July. They also edited, the article I was working on at the time, three times on 21 July, committing similar vandalisn The IP was blocked on 21 July.
 * was created on 16 July, vandalized Chaos magic on 16 July and 17 July, and was blocked on 21 July along with the first IP.
 * 107.202.75.102's block expired ~21 August. They reappeared on 30 August 2021, editing the first sentence of the "Practice" section of Chaos magic.
 * User then hops to on August 31, again vandalizing Chaos magic, and prodding a related article.
 * User then hops to, immediately editing the first sentence of the "Practice" section of Chaos magic, last edited by 107.202.75.102 just the day before. User also make first mention of the term "sock puppet," which I had been careful not to use.

. Skyerise (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Added another sock ip, who has been making reverts of my edits only intended to harass, was well as vandalizing article, for example, this edit, which appears to refer to this SPI report, and restoring the prod template on Playback (technique), originally placed there by IPsock 107.116.7.105. Skyerise (talk) 12:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

And yet another one,, redoing edits which were reverted by BilCat after the previous IPv6 was block. Isn't it about time to report this guy to his Internet provider? Skyerise (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

And yet another,, restoring an edit placed by both 2600:387:f:4a14::4 and 107.116.7.5. Skyerise (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * We can look into edit filters, but I can't block the /12 they're hopping around. Blocked the most recently active two. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of them are 107.116.7.x Perhaps the others are harder for them to access... work vs. home? Skyerise (talk) 13:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Back again. Still making disruptive edits to Chaos magic and related topics. This time Illuminates of Thanateros, Peter J. Carroll, Lionel Snell, and Ralph Tegtmeier. Uses same language in edit summaries as previous socks. Intent continues to be to harass me by disrupting articles on my watchlist. Per WP:DUCK. Skyerise (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This trail in particular on Lionel Snell is telling. Always removing the same material: 2600:387:F:4A14:0:0:0:4, 257.122.14,1O, Numbers and periods that look like an ip address. Skyerise (talk) 20:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Do I know you somehow? Is your watched pages list public? How would I get that sort of info? Citation needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 257.122.14,1O (talk • contribs) 19:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - 'numbers and periods' looks like a throwaway trolling account, so have blocked, as does the 257 account which is already blocked. I'm less confident about Skyrider777, although their last couple of contribs don't inspire confidence. CU might be able to confirm. I'm leaving the IPs for now.  Girth Summit  (blether)  14:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * is
 * is ✅ to.
 * ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Accounts all blocked; IPs have gone quiet, come back if they start up again.  Girth Summit  (blether)  22:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Removing the same material from Lionel Snell as previous socks 2600:387:f:401b::6, Numbers and periods that look like an ip address, and 257.122.14,1O. Also impersonating the subject of the article. Skyerise (talk) 16:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GeneralNotability (talk) 17:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Brand new user's (Oct 19) first two article edits are to two of the articles repeatedly targetted by our puppetmaster, and. New user uses similar edit summaries, "more content", "added content", to add uncited material intended to deprecate the subject of the article or lessen their achievements. Then of course there is the username they chose. Sure to be somebody's sock. Ought to be checkusered. Skyerise (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ by way of Skyrider777. . GeneralNotability (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New user suddenly appears to oppose me with their first edit. But wait! The article has been edited multiple times by IPs known to be associated with Raxythecat. 107.77.222.212, 107.116.7.30, 2600:8800:8386:8400:ec2b:a03f:315e:7b34, 107.127.0.85, and 107.127.0.85 again. Skyerise (talk) 22:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * From the records in the CU logs, coupled with the behavioural aspects, I'm calling this ✅. Blocking, tagging, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  10:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This all started while I was patrolling the user creation log (as I usually do) just a little bit ago. I noticed that an account was created with the username. Looking at their contributions, I saw that they added vandalism to the Jim Bob Duggar article. I blocked the user per obvious WP:NOTHERE and moved on. However, shortly afterwards and while continuing to patrol the user creation log, I noticed that an account was created with the username, and saw that they also added vandalism to the same article. I checked the article history and noticed the same pattern with numerous accounts. After running a series of checks with the checkuser tool, I was able to locate and link the following accounts listed above and to the blocked sock master. They all edit through the same (wide) IP range and with the same user agent. I'm creating this SPI retroactively for record-keeping and accountability purposes. These accounts will be confirmed and tagged.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   08:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts listed are ✅. As stated above, they all edited using the same IP range (though wide), and with the same user agent, and with the same kind of disruption to the same or similar articles as other confirmed sock accounts. Tagging accounts and filing this SPI as 'closed'...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   08:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Connecting dots here. Articles Gnosis (chaos magic), Kia (magic), and Sigil were targets of Raxythecat. The IP listed above edited the first two articles and also vandalized Tony Perkins (politician). started with the third (Sigil), and then went on to vandalize Tony Perkins (politician). Although this user has not been blocked, next to appear is, whose name follows the pattern of Raxythecat. This user also vandalizes Tony Perkins the same day as Josiedubia. Improved sock skills also posted this on their talk page:

"From now on, I will change my user agent to make it harder to tie my socks together. Check the UA I chose for this account. I will age accounts two days so those patrolling new users won't see the edits immediately. I am also going to change the email provider to a list of popular providers. I will widen my circle of targets significantly. Thanks again"

So I am requesting checkuser to determine if these are additional socks of Raxythecat, so that Josiedubia can be blocked and both tagged. Pretty sure they are Raxythecat. Skyerise (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * GeneralNotability (talk) 00:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to call them to the most recent batch between behavior, useragents, and general geolocation. . . GeneralNotability (talk) 00:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Tally Indue's first edit is to add "Superstition" to the see also section of sigil, which a number of previous socks have done. TI then goes on to remove the category Category:German male non-fiction writers from Ralph Tegtmeier, one of Raxythecat's favorite targets, on the "basis" that occultism is fiction, commenting that the author "writes fantasy books for fantasy fans". Again, this same edit has been made by one or two previous sockpuppets. Then Jesse Adze makes this edit, changing "occultist" to "fantasy author". Looks like Raxythecat to me. Skyerise (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Also noting from the history of Ralph Tegtmeier.  - Confirmation and sleeper check (given those found previously) please. --Jack Frost (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Technically, they're all somewhere between and ; taking behaviour into account, I'm blocking, tagging and closing.   Girth Summit  (blether)  00:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Vandalized Ralph Tegtmeier, one of this user's usual targets. Please check for sleepers. Skyerise (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: previous socks include User:No Socks On My Feet, User:Feet but no socks, and User:S0cksonmyfeet. Skyerise (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's no big deal, but just so you know, I removed the tag you placed on their userpage. Unblocked accounts should never be tagged (see WP:HSOCK), and it's almost always best to leave the tagging to administrators, clerks and checkusers. Thanks! --Blablubbs (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, sorry. He's just so damn obvious. Skyerise (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * As with previous socks, the CU data isn't definitive, but it's definitely possible; coupled with the username and behaviour, I'm blocking and tagging. Throwing in as an obvious sleeper, CU ✅ to Foot gloves. Closing.   Girth Summit  (blether)  15:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Making the same kind of edits to the same set of articles: Gnosis (chaos magic), Sigil, Austin Osman Spare, Gnosis (chaos magic), Sigil, Chaos magic. Please check for sleepers. Skyerise (talk) 13:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus -- RoySmith (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Vandalizing related articles, , and. All articles this editor has targeted before and the IP matches their previous IPV6 range. Always best to check for sleepers with this one. Skyerise (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Also semi-protected the two most recent targets. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
First edit is to vandalize Peter J. Carroll. Objects to User:Raxythecat being discussed at ANI, specifically about being mentioned as someone who had unlikely access to a specific corporate network. Skyerise (talk) 21:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC) Skyerise (talk) 21:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * blocked -- RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

User repeatably keeps changing photo in Josh Duggar article. When I gave final warning to the Hull Slicks account, user began same activity with Laced taut account. Since has gone onto vandalize more Duggar family related articles as well as vandalize a talk page and insult other users. Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Straightforward behavioural evidence yields:
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  12:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm confident that this is (there are some notes on cuwiki). There are a bunch of other accounts on a couple of busy ranges that might also be them, but it's not possible to determine who's who purely on the technical data. I'm out of time at this present moment, so I'm going to endorse this in the hopes that another CU would be willing to take a look and consider whether any of the other accounts on those ranges need blocking.  Girth Summit  (blether)  13:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 17:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Also found -- RoySmith (talk) 17:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
AT&T in Houston like many of the other IP socks. Attempting to vandalize the Phil Hine article (one of his usuals) by false copyvio reports. Skyerise (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sure looks like them. Blocked two weeks. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Top two in the list returned to disrupting Ipotane after the rest were Checkuser blocked. Obvious DUCKs. Also, please re-protect Ipotane and Centaur. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 06:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The two new socks have now been blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Bogus tag bombing of Chaos magic, disruption at Genesis P-Orridge and Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth, all targets of the master and/or other puppets. Similar axe-to-grind attitude. Looks like a sleeper created at the last go-round. Skyerise (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Um, no. I haven’t edited that article AT ALL until today, when you started harassing me. I have been a user in good standing for years and I couldn’t care less about this. Your accusations are baseless. Dronebogus (talk) 00:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The offending sock master first edited in 2021 as a clear SPA. I have been around since 2020: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Dronebogus&target=Dronebogus&dir=prev not counting IP edits and have made thousands of edits across dozens of articles. Does that sound like a sock to you? Dronebogus (talk) 00:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The offending sockmaster edited as a dynamic IP address for years before getting pinned to a username. They always target Chaos magic. They always tag bomb it with undeserved tags, among other things. You're really looking like a WP:DUCK here. Have I really finally found your non-throwaway account?! Skyerise (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The only similarity is the fact that we made a few similar edits to one page. Have you never heard of a coincidence? Dronebogus (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I feel you. It must suck getting caught. But it's not your edits that identify you. It's your attitude. That's why I waited to see what you would say when you inevitably reverted me before filing the report. Skyerise (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * “My attitude” is not hard evidence. At all. You’re sounding about as convincing as the House Un-American Activities Committee grilling a KNOWN COMMUNIST. Dronebogus (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Dr._Strangelove_-_Riding_the_Bomb.png Skyerise (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe it’s your attitude of paranoid page ownership that makes people hostile. Dronebogus (talk) 00:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you're not a sock, you just have to wait, you know. Maybe it's your two and half years of harassing me that make you easy to recognize. Skyerise (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Skyerise, stop harassing Dronebogus and blanket reverting good edits. A boomerang is called for to stop you. Your long block log needs more entries. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I am following the correct processes in the correct places. And I haven't reverted or interacted with them anywhere but here since I opened it. Since when is that bad behavior? I'm not harassing anyone, I am replying here and that's it. Skyerise (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * No you’re not you literally just canvassed someone else I was arguing with to harass me. You are the one who is fooling nobody. Dronebogus (talk) 01:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * As I said, if you're not a sock, you're not in trouble. The checkusers will sort it out. They always do. If I'm wrong, apologies. There's nothing wrong with having more eyes on an article. Skyerise (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Well then maybe stop treating me as guilty until proven innocent. Dronebogus (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
User:Skyerise, a sleeper created at the last go-round? Which was in December 2022, and this account was created in 2020? A year before the Raxythecat account was made? Drmies (talk) 03:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Insufficient evidence to justify CU. Closing. Spicy (talk) 15:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Assorted shenanigans on Ludington-related Coldwell articles, likely some sort of troll who was keeping up with things. Hoax at James Ludington, removing indications that story is false from Sybil Ludington, and then more bad editing at Sybil. Giving the timing and the close subject matter, I suspect this is all the same person; requesting CU as there's often sleepers with this sort of nonsense. Hog Farm Talk 03:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Hog Farm Talk 03:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

CU wiki might want to have at hand a list of Coldwell-related articles. I can email that if y'all don't know where to locate it. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  13:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ to - both already blocked.
 * looks different, but is ✅ to, which I will also block.
 * looks different again. I'm not inclined to take any action against that account at this time; if they persist with these shenanigans however, they can be blocked (and checked again if there are more accounts). Girth Summit  (blether)  10:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have time to dig deep right now, but the Ludingtons and .swig.voids. are spoofing UAs, the purported master probably is as well. I'm fairly confident these are all – there are some notes on cuwiki for that one.  --Blablubbs (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll take a look at those notes later. Girth Summit  (blether)  13:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I blocked I drink books and know things and tagged them as a sock of .swig.voids. before I became aware of this case. Anything you wish me to do or undo in that regard?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Bbb23: I'd say removing the tag and merging this case with RTC is probably the best way forward. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * , since my question I've blocked without tags three accounts editing various Ludington articles:
 * What should be done with them?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I would just leave all of these untagged. For what it's worth, I'd say these are varying degrees of to the other accounts here from a technical perspective. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm convinced about the Ludington Historian/Scholar accounts. Not certain about the .seig.voids. - if it's RtC it looks like they're using a new IP range, but that wouldn't be particularly surprising - I'm not too bothered with how we tag them, they're throwaway vandalism accounts., yes please to an email of that list, although I expect they will move on to a different subject to troll about - this Doug Coldwell thing isn't their normal area of interest afaik. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * - Per 's request, this report should be merged to Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat. Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Done, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm convinced about the Ludington Historian/Scholar accounts. Not certain about the .seig.voids. - if it's RtC it looks like they're using a new IP range, but that wouldn't be particularly surprising - I'm not too bothered with how we tag them, they're throwaway vandalism accounts., yes please to an email of that list, although I expect they will move on to a different subject to troll about - this Doug Coldwell thing isn't their normal area of interest afaik. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * - Per 's request, this report should be merged to Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat. Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Done, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)

See User:Very Senior Editor and the "Jimmy Saville Barnstar" on talk page. Quack? CandyScythe (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This account has been CU blocked. I'll ping in case he has any comments, but I'm closing this. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 11:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Very Average Editor = Raxythecat (feel free to tag if you want). From a technical perspective, it doesn't look like there's a connection to this case. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll move the filing and tag given the tenure of the account. Spicy (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Filing moved from Sockpuppet investigations/New England Cop, closing. Spicy (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
The first user seems to be set on edit-warring to place a disputed tag on Magic (supernatural) against consensus, which resembles the behavior of Roxythecat on Chaos magic and other related articles. They also claimed to have posted on the talk page, but the post they refer to was actually posted by who, while not blocked as a sock of Raxythecat, was briefly active during Raxy's most active period and didn't do much other editing besides the 2 comments on Talk:Magic (supernatural). Skyerise (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Insufficient evidence to block Loytra, and Manderson22 hasn't edited in a year and a half. Closing without action. Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Fairly obvious from the behaviour - messing around with articles on chaos magic, offensive username, and trolling on their talk page. Requesting checkuser to confirm and look for other accounts. If this is RaxyTheCat they should have their talk page and email access revoked, per the note on this page. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've revoked TPA and disabled e-mail. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * per below. Ponyo bons mots 16:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, noting for the record. Will update CU-wiki.-- Ponyo bons mots 16:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
This new user is following the same pattern of editting LDS and Book of Mormon related articles very shortly after the last sock was blocked. In particular, this edit is very similar to, , and by the last sock. The new potential sock has also used "Rm" at the start of an edit summary here, which was also a common behavior (see, , and ) by the last identified sockpuppet. Requesting CU in case there are any sleepers, as there were at least two socks operating concurrently in the last couple months. FyzixFighter (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Looks like a duck to me, but I'll wait for a CU to confirm. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅.-- Ponyo bons mots 19:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Tagged; closing. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Removing content from Theosophy-related articles, like previous socks (User:Big Money Threepwood). Jfire (talk) 04:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅.-- Ponyo bons mots 19:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Tagged; closing. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Very similar edits as one of the previous socks (User:Big Money Threepwood) - removing circular redirects from List of Book of Mormon people, and PRODing Book of Mormon-related stubs. They have a similar pattern of lowercasing shorthands to wikipedia-space pages (eg "wp:gng" as seen here and here). FyzixFighter (talk) 06:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Pretty, as is and their sock, . Blocking all.  Girth Summit  (blether)  13:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Doing the same type of edits the supposed master did on Masayoshi Son.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 07:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Turns out Spicy blocked the suspected sock as a sock of Raxythecat (log).  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 20:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Can you add in the notes below the other socks that were identified from the CU check and that got blocked? --FyzixFighter (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I suspect that the suspected sock is a joe-job, partly based on their using a different platform (mobile) and partly because of their edits to other pages besides the Son article, e.g., ANI. I'm requesting a CU, not to protect the suspected sock, but the suspected master from being blocked indefinitely for block evasion. Bbb23 (talk) 12:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * - Please move report to Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat and close. Bbb23 (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Done. Spicy (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, here's a (probably incomplete) list of ones I've blocked recently. I don't tend to tag these.
 * Spicy (talk) 23:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)