Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raydarosco/Archive

Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky
This editor previously attempted to force an "edit request" on Talk:Raymond Lam and Raymond Lam as well, using different accounts, as seen here, here, here and here. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 14:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * This editor seems desperate to make the same (drastic) change to the article, which consists mostly of content that violates WP:BLP guidelines. 暗無天日  contact me (聯絡) 14:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * Seems ducky. I'm not sure a CU is needed. ( X! ·  talk )  · @851  · 19:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
– Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that the IPs (there are more too) and Raydarosco are the same person; no CU necessary. That said, Raydarosco has been indefinitely blocked and the Raymond Lam article semi-protected for 3 months. –MuZemike 01:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky
This edit (most recent one) by the IP editor is similar to this edit, done about 4 months ago, by the (blocked) sockpuppeteer. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I'm going to mark this for close. The IP has not edited in a couple of days and one similar edit is not enough to warrant blocking. Further disruption can be reported at AIV or here. TN X Man 14:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)