Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Razack Zamarul/Archive

Evidence submitted by Aleenf1
Both user seems to have identical editing skills, e.g. copy and paste article, move without discussion, etc. Zackyusoff blocked for repeated abuse of editing privileges, while Razack Zamarul was created soon with identical editing skills, talk page comments in Razack Zamarul account can be a probe. --Aleen f 1 18:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
– I can see the similarities in the two, but I don't think it's convincing enough for me to block on behavioral patterns alone, hence my endorsement for CU. –MuZemike 18:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

hasn't edited since early April. And there is nothing immediately suspicious about that CU reveals. KnightLago (talk) 02:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

However, including and comparing the 3 accounts results in. If someone wants to look into it, there may be enough there for a DUCK block. KnightLago (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'm not seeing anything that gives me enough confidence to block. Lack of CU + lack of behavioral evidence leads me to believe that these accounts are ❌. ( X! ·  talk )  · @244  · 04:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)