Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raznice/Archive

Evidence submitted by Andy Dingley
User:Raznice has persistently added the same self-promotional paragraph to Web 2.0 and similar to Semantic Web. There has been no other support for this content and it has regularly been reverted by a number of editors. They have also used IPsocks to re-add it, particularly as they're now under a 48 hr block for it. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I've semi-protected Web 2.0, which should stop any logged out edits. If Raznice persists with the spamming, they can be reported to AIV. I don't think there's much here for SPI to handle, but I'll leave this open for a bit in case something new crops up. TN X Man 17:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN X Man  23:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)