Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Realwords101/Archive

Evidence submitted by Phantomsteve
The article Dancehall has been full protected for a week following a content dispute between and other editors (I am not involved other than the protecting admin). The user requested page protection (even though that account had done no editing of the Dancehall article), which was initially declined, and then I protected the article, having reverted to the last consensual version. The only other edits that Wordsforyou have made are to the talk page of the article to defend Realwords101's version. (Incidently, the Wordsforyou account was created at 08:36 this morning). To me, this appears to clearly be a sock to "back up" Realwords101's preferred version of the article, as no other editor appears to agree with his/her version --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 16:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 16:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC) The similarities are very similar and the name should be a dead giveaway that something is up. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. Unambiguous. Also:
 * --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Between Fences&Windows and myself, everyone's blocked and tagged. TN X Man  20:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Between Fences&Windows and myself, everyone's blocked and tagged. TN X Man  20:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)