Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rebeccaaarr/Archive

Evidence submitted by Amatulic
Accounts all created within a few minutes of one another, all used to disrupt  and its talk page. I have blocked all but Rebeccaaarr per WP:DUCK. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
This user should be blocked for block evasion. --Confession0791 (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * None of the accounts I mention above have evaded a block, as they were just created today. Is there another sockmaster account involved here that was previously blocked? ~Amatulić (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It depends on if these accounts are socks or meatpuppets. If they are socks, the sockmaster should be blocked for evasion. --Confession0791 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
All three registered accounts are ❌ on technical evidence. –MuZemike 21:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Huh. That's interesting, given the account creation times, the single purpose of each, and the substantially similar edit content. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind that it is only technical evidence. There could be something else going on such as meatpuppetry or other odd stuff. –MuZemike 03:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to mark this for close. Two of the accounts have been blocked and if the main account continues with the same edits, they can be blocked as a vandalism-only account. TN X Man  13:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks like a pretty typical 4chan-esque raid. I agree that we can close this up now. NW ( Talk ) 14:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)