Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RedRose333/Archive

Report date May 31 2009, 23:52 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

StarbucksMusic37 and 995Star seem to edit the same articles that RedRose333, in the same fashion. They have both edited List of characters from iCarly, What's the 411?, Kenan & Kel ‎, among many other similar articles. RedRose333 was blocked indefinitely on April 23, 2009 (UTC). StarbucksMusic37 created his/her account April 23, 2009, a couple of hours after RedRose333 was blocked. After a few days of editing, StarbucksMusic37 blanked their talk page after several warnings, while 995Star registered his/her account two minutes after the blanking. Far too uncanny to be different people. I'm also requesting checkuser because I believe there is another account out there (I remember seeing a username containing "Starbucks" that was registered around the period above as well, but I can't remember the exact username nor what article it edited). —  Σ xplicit  23:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by —  Σ xplicit 


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by —  Σ xplicit  23:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

There appear to be two sets of sockpuppets here, that are not conclusively related.
 * Conclusions
 * 1) Group 1
 * 2) *✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence confirms the relationship between the following accounts:
 * 3) Group 2
 * 4) *✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence confirms the relationship between the following accounts:
 * 5) * It is possible that the following account may be related to the two above:
 * 6) Relationship between groups 1 and 2
 * 7) * Currently available technical evidence is inconclusive as to a relationship between the groups. A more detailed behavioral analysis may be more fruitful.
 * 1) Group 2
 * 2) *✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence confirms the relationship between the following accounts:
 * 3) * It is possible that the following account may be related to the two above:
 * 4) Relationship between groups 1 and 2
 * 5) * Currently available technical evidence is inconclusive as to a relationship between the groups. A more detailed behavioral analysis may be more fruitful.
 * 1) Group 2
 * 2) *✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence confirms the relationship between the following accounts:
 * 3) * It is possible that the following account may be related to the two above:
 * 4) Relationship between groups 1 and 2
 * 5) * Currently available technical evidence is inconclusive as to a relationship between the groups. A more detailed behavioral analysis may be more fruitful.
 * 1) Group 2
 * 2) *✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence confirms the relationship between the following accounts:
 * 3) * It is possible that the following account may be related to the two above:
 * 4) Relationship between groups 1 and 2
 * 5) * Currently available technical evidence is inconclusive as to a relationship between the groups. A more detailed behavioral analysis may be more fruitful.
 * 1) * It is possible that the following account may be related to the two above:
 * 2) Relationship between groups 1 and 2
 * 3) * Currently available technical evidence is inconclusive as to a relationship between the groups. A more detailed behavioral analysis may be more fruitful.
 * 1) * Currently available technical evidence is inconclusive as to a relationship between the groups. A more detailed behavioral analysis may be more fruitful.

-- Avi (talk) 00:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Tagged and blocked. —  Jake   Wartenberg  00:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)