Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Redmoon660/Archive

17 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

These are all single purpose accounts that have been created to edit only the Aristides de Sousa Mendes article. The first one was warned not to edit because it was named "Sousa Mendes Foundation" and that individuals acting on behalf of this person or organization are strongly advised not to edit the article The accounts get involved in disputes and disruptive editing and massive deletions. Then one account closes and a new one is open on almost the same day. The style and POV are always the same. The last account erased the warning tags about the connections of the first account. The last account, Beebop211, also edited an article of someone personally connected with the Sousa Mendes Foundation  JPratas (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Besides the excessive support for one's cause they also connect through music. Both words Redmoon and Beboop are connected to music with the latest being a style of Jazz. I can provide more information but I don’t want to expose the user.JPratas (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

If it makes any difference I would like to make it clear that I have no wish whatsoever to have these accounts blocked, but if these accounts are connected to the Sousa Mendes Foundation they should participate in the connected articles identified as such. It is more transparent. JPratas (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I am wondering how User:Just Facts and Figures figures into this situation? It seems that this account has edited in a very similar way to User:Jpratas. By the way, I have been trying to encourage two editors to work toward consensus though both seem determined to push their respective points of view at all cost.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  05:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Looks like this could be meatpuppetry but would a CU please have a look and see what's going on. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Although the master is, and  are ✅ to each other.  is technically  to be the same user.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The three confirmed accounts are blocked and tagged. I haven't blocked the unlikely account or the one Cullen suggested as Cu would have found it. Closing now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)