Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reiksnza/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

My evidence that these listed users are sockpuppets is: 1) each suspected puppet has edited the same page. 2) each suspected puppet has done the same thing to the page, blanking a section. 3) each suspected puppet has used the same edit summary, that the content they removed was biased. 4) two of the suspected puppets have literally the same username. I mean, Reiksnzaw and Reiksnza? Don’t tell me this wasn’t the same person. It’s just one letter difference, but it’s glaringly obvious. The other one is an IP address, but did the same thing. I have a pretty good reason to believe that all three are being operated by the same vandal. HelenDegenerate (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Reiksnza came first with one and only one on April 4, 2021 and has not edited since Reiksnzaw started, so it's conceivable the first name was a spelling error and they just created a second account. Both look to be looking to Whitewash Westwood Park, San Francisco‎. I'm inclined to block Reiksnza (without the "w") just to simplify things. Half asleep and awaiting an opinion from those more experienced with SPI's. Perhaps the clerk can move this? Don't see a need for a check user. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 06:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The suggestion that they just corrected the spelling of the account name seems on the mark. I don't see anything that triggers WP:ILLEGIT, so closing with no action. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)