Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reisio/Archive

03 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

He has been repeatedly removing referenced material at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legacy_port&action=history. The 05:01, 1 January 2011 edit by 70.92.132.205 removed references and made no changes to content, then Reisio removed the content. Pantergraph (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * You think I reverted you with this account that many times and then switched to an IP for kicks? :p The reason people are always removing stuff from that article (yes, me included, but also several others [see talk]) is because the entire article is original research. Your "references" which you only sought out and added after I requested you did are unreliable, or to put it slightly better, laughable.  I removed them the last time because as far as I could tell our edit war was over after I fixed the definition, and because again they were terrible "references", and because you appear unable to add references properly inside ref tags. ¦ Reisio (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Either the editor was logged out, or it's someone different. No case to persue here. Please do talk out the dispute though in a different venue. --  DQ (t)  Merry Chrismasand a Happy New Year!   20:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)