Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Relpmek/Archive

20 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Relpmek is Roni Kempler. He attempted to add material sourced to him at Mona Lisa, Speculation about Mona Lisa, Agostino Vespucci ‎  and Lisa del Giocondo up until 18 March this year. Simple Blue began to do the same thing on 4 March, stopping at 8 August. Ago Ves edited once in April with their next edit on 8 August and is still editing. See the discussion at WP:RSN. Dougweller (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Yup. All three users exhibit exactly the same disruptive behavior, viz. trying to use Wikipedia to promote themselves (himself) by adding his website into various articles, using the accounts' userpages to promote it, and promoting the theory at noticeboards. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * —  Kudu ~I/O~ 13:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both socks have been blocked already. Is there more socking here that I don't know about? I'm inclined to leave Relpmek with one account for now, so I'll close. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:23, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is User:Prof. Art. Paul B (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

19 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Self admitted they were Kempler while edit warring on a talk page.also see all the IPs joining in in the festivities this Yuletide Lerd the nerd  wiki defender  21:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser is generally not used to connect accounts with IPs. The case will need to be evaluated based on behavioural evidence alone. TDL (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Based on the behaviour of the IP, I've merged Sockpuppet investigations/Kempler here. TDL (talk) 02:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * - Who is "Kempler"? And, please, provide WP:diff of IP "admitting" being Kempler.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  01:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You should have sked me or some other admin to perform a WP:history merge. It is always better to have all the history in one place, than to copy-paste. But, it's not a really big problem, so it can stay like this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * for 2 weeks, self-admitted block evasion of most recent sock Justnotplagiarism. Talk:Speculations about Mona Lisa already SPP'ed before I got to it. I also histmerged WP:SPI/Kempler to WP:SPI/Relpmek anyways. IPs 82.166.83.91 & 85.250.163.194 are also used to continue fighting the same battles for only once each so I don't think blocking is useful now, but if they start being used again, then they should be blocked as well. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  18:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

19 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Doug Weller talk 09:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Doug Weller talk 09:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged... whom?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops, I had to start over due to a typo and forgot to add the sock. I'm puzzled that we have Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Relpmek as well as Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Relpmek - shouldn't they as least link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 10:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * We have two such categories for every sockpupeteer. "Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of..." is for sockpuppets tagged as "confirmed" and "proven", while "Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of..." is for sockpuppets tagged as "suspected". And, yes, they do link to each other. In the blue box at the top of the category page, there are links.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Doug Weller talk 18:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Doug Weller talk 18:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Just another duck. Doug Weller talk 19:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Add another, also . Doug Weller  talk 19:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious duck is obvious (see also EF for gaming) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)