Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ReportBritainFirst/Archive

13 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All new editors showed up within 30 minutes making problematic edits at Britain First Neil N  talk to me 23:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

https://www.facebook.com/Exposing0Britain0First/photos/a.1426634540936171.1073741828.1423096294623329/1432250710374554/ Here is evidence of previous organised campaigns against Britain First. If this is being repeated, it is more a case of meatpuppetry or outside recruitment than sockpuppetry &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checkuser comments: Without doing any checks at this point, this looks more like a co-ordinated editing process in response to the Facebook page (which would probably have continued over time, since it creates such lulz), rather than a bunch of socks.  Checkuser is unlikely to yield any actionable results.  Risker (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, all except are WP:SPAs. Looks more like meatpuppetry. Since users do not have any other edits, it is hard to prove sockpuppetry, even if it exists. I believe this case should be closed at the moment, and reopened if new evidence arises.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)