Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Resealed/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There is so much tag-team SPA voting at Articles for deletion/Jason Deeh Pitre and editing of identical sections of the bio article that do believe something is going on. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * My apologies. I didn't realize the SPI had to be named for the oldest named account -- which in retrospect makes sense. I believe that's User:Resealed, by a matter of hours. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This was misfiled. Please move it to the oldest named account.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 23:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * - Please, compare those two named accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * CheckUser is as one of the IPs used is a webhost. . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * - After a behavioral review, I am inclined to believe this is the same person. There is a similar disapproving tone, the same non-signing of posts, and the same use of quotations. Please block the sock indef and the master at your discretion. Thanks, GABgab 21:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sock blocked, master warned. None of the accounts have edited in 10 days so I don't think that any other blocks are warranted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)