Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Riccione/Archive

11 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Named account was indef'ed (not his first block) as SPA edit-warrior at American Chemical Society. These IPs engage in same behavior (either dynamic or intentionally changed). Talk-page discussion has multiple editors opposing and no others supporting (at least not in the form this editor keeps using). Editor has resorted to mis-representing the state of the talkpage discussion, including most recently impersonating an editor with the opposing view in order to mischaracterize that editor's position. The two pools of IPs geolocate to named account's claimed home country. DMacks (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have struck part of this accusation, as I was mis-reading the links. However, I stand by my claim that IP is either unable or unwilling to understand or accept how the discussion has gone. Maybe language barrier, maybe WP:IDHT, doesn't really matter because the problem is socking as well as edit-warring. DMacks (talk) 09:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All listed IPs are stale at this point, so I'm closing this now. Note that the page is now semi-protected, which probably the best option when dealing with IP-hoppers. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)