Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RicegoneWILD/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)
 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Near same randomly generated username, same defamatory edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thouron_Award&diff=prev&oldid=970418162 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thouron_Award&diff=977789816&oldid=977789146 designed to harass an existing non notable individual with unsupported claims inappropriate for an encyclopedia Shaananc (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Some others:
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


 * - As I dig deeper through the article histories, more of these keep showing up. If I've found this many, there must be more that I'm not seeing. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Most of your additionals are stale, but ✅ RicegoneWILD, Pfbeqmrgkoqrijuvvnafj2, AwoeifjasodlkP. Everything else is all over the place. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 09:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * everybody. RicegoneWILD is now the oldest account (by far), so renamed the case (again).  Most of these are obvious from a behavioral standpoint.  RicegoneWILD goes back 14 years and doesn't fit the behavioral pattern, but given that it's CU-confirmed, I'm blocking them as well, and if they appeal the block, they can explain at that point how they thought what they were doing was legitimate. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)