Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richindiogo12/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I have this feeling that this and another one called Special:Contributions/Unitedfenty (already blocked) have been used to edit the Rihanna article when possible. I have noticed that when edits made to the page happened today. The user name pattern should be the first clue between the two. Iggy (Swan) 17:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - FentyUnited popped up after Richindigo gets blocked. Too much coincidence for me, given the overlap of edits, needs a check. qedk (t 桜 c) 19:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * They edit from a busy range. The accounts match each other technically exactly, but there are several other exact technical matches that are almost certainly false positives. So, from a purely technical standpoint, I'd go with . Combining technical evidence with behavioural, I could maybe call it . It seems like quite a coincidence that two accounts with similar interests would edit from the same range, but given the false positives, it could be a coincidence. --Deskana (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * - The username is a dead giveaway primarily, I'm not willing to give them the benefit of doubt, recommend indeffing. And thanks for the check,, seeing you around after a while! qedk (t 桜 c) 12:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅. Leaving tagging up to you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Ivan. Tagged, closing. qedk (t 桜 c) 13:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)