Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Riitoken/Archive

20 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Suspicious behavior all related to contentious COI afds related to User:Riitoken. User:Lee_Reece74 and User:Katie Sweetmore have nearly identical edit patterns. IP address's only contribution has been to a related AfD. Also possible that Lee Reece74 and Katie Sweetmore are meatpuppets. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * A CheckUser run may be useful in this case, to check for any more accounts. Hey  Mid  (contribs) 17:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do here, since a redundant case was filed before this, and the mentioned accounts (except Riitoken) and alot of others have been blocked as sock puppets of . Hey  Mid  (contribs) 17:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * My Statement, I have one account (Riitoken) on Wikipedia and that is the only account I've ever used (excepting a few minor edits as anon-ip way back when before I registered).  I have never heard of these other accounts until now.  To my knowledge I've never lied anywhere at anytime on Wikipedia.  I have nothing to gain by lying.  I did recently show my daughter how to tag uncited article claims, with the cn tag, from her laptop, here on our home LAN - you can find the recent details in the Scarf article; she does not have an account and so you will see anon-ip for that edit.  Assuming your CheckUser is as good as those I've written (i.e. does not produce false positives), I am not worried or fearful that it will find anything that contradicts my statement here. --Riitoken (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
checkuser request declined, since a checkuser has already been run on &  here, while Riitoken was not stale. If he was socking with those accounts, he would have been expected to have shown up on that check. SpitfireTally-ho! 18:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)