Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RishabhCine/Archive

20 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Very similar user names. Original user blocked for spamming articles with links to their webiste CineReport; the reasoning can be seen here. This new account's reasoning at the said article's deletion request is also interesting. A sweeper check may be good as well, as and  may be related. Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 17:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Wikipedia can check my IP and all other users IP. Yes my first account was blocked named RishabhCine. But I also mentioned in that account That I will not do spaaming and administrator got agree also. So I made a new account and also doing proper editing. GreenTalk 17:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Good catch . It looks like RishabhCine either misinterpreted the standard offer mentioned in their talk page, or simply ignored it. I blocked the sock per the admission above and added  to the spam blacklist. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 18:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Please, explain (using WP:diffs) the connection of Khadeerali and MakingTree to the rest.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I believe Krimuk90 is referring to the !votes in this AFD. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:50, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * With the account blocked by FreeRangeFrog, I'm closing this case. Mike V • Talk 00:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)