Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rndhnr/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

(from ANI): Rndhnr has been on a cross-wiki campaign inserting a false titleholder in the article on the Duke of Gandía. I recently added an official reference (Official State Gazette, notice from the Spanish Ministry of Justice) on the current titleholder. Suspect that user Rndhnr is the same as the ip 60.153.93.4 who also edited the same article adding the same individual and also the same as HistoiredeFrance who left me a message claiming that the line is not accurate according to a soon-to-be-released book on the history of the Borja (Borgia) and whose edit in the article on Elzéar of Sabran, where he added the same false titleholder, was undone. Maragm (talk) 08:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Adding another suspect IP 60.152.122.245 who just reverted my edit removing false info. Maragm (talk) 11:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

HistoiredeFrance and Rndhnr are likely socks of each other: Adding truthy-looking but bogus claims of nobility is the MO of Siredejoinville, who has been doing this across several languages as an apparent self-promotion campaign for some years. Guy (Help!) 23:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The actual duke is Arnaud Henry Salas-Perez (HistoiredeFrance)
 * Arnaud Henry Salas-Perez, 21st Duke of Osuna, 20th Duke of Gandie, 2016- (Rndhnr)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * please - need CU to flush out likely sleepers. This is a LTA case. Guy (Help!) 12:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
User states they have written a book on the Borja, claim also made by Siredejoinville, all articles are part of Siredejoinville's edit history, the same names crop up. It seems very likely that this is the same person, buton the evidence additional socks are likely to be out there. Guy (Help!) 23:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * . This is not the optimal way to file a report or request a CU. First, I had trouble figuring out that it was you filing. Second, the instructions tell you how to request a CU, and it's not the way you did it. Finally, why put your comments in three different sections? Just put them all in the first section. Later, if you have something to add, you could put a comment somewhere else, but not at the time of filing. My comments are not intended to be negative - just tips for the future.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * My bad, I have dreadful sinusitis and a headache the last couple of days and can barely see straight. It's not like I haven't done this before. Bah. Sorry. Guy (Help!) 14:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Did it ever occur to you to go rest? --Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Crazy talk. Thanks :-) Guy (Help!) 21:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Rndhnr is to the above two accounts. I’ve blocked the three accounts without tags. Siredejoinville is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please change the tagging. I only confirmed two accounts, not all three.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please change the tagging. I only confirmed two accounts, not all three.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * ✅ Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Blocked on fr-wiki and now blocked here. Just adding names for completeness. No action necessary Ron h jones (Talk) 12:00, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''