Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rob Dibble/Archive

19 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

All three users are single purpose accounts deleting information from Rob Dibble. deleted information here, here, here and here. User Rob Dibble was warned, and politely asked to contact Arbcom if he were the real Rob Dibble.  began deleting content here and here. deleted content here. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 04:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This does look like a brute force attempt to remove unfavorable (and referenced) information using several accounts. Removal edits are not a bullet proof evidence, and thus I would support a CU check. Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are  matches,  appears ❌.  TN X Man  14:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, so I blocked No.life4u as a sock of Rob Dibble; I blocked Rob Dibble for three days for sockpuppeting, and I blocked Googlemyname for collusion in some capacity. Even if they're unrelated, their edits are still close enough to the master/sock that I'm counting it. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)