Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Robbartbmillar/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Master and first three accounts spamming for the same dental business on their respective talk pages. spamming for different dental business in the same location. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - definitely looks like the same spam, I've queued linksummaries for the domains but replication is lagged enough that none of the current socks show up. Endorsed to see where else this farm has popped up. Note that the domain was also linked by (no enwiki account) on meta, so there's a possibility of cross-wiki spam. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked a few . -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 22:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Added one more domain per AmandaNP's findings. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , listing for the archives:
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, is it worth renaming this to Robbartbmillar? BTW, the first revision of their user talk is kind of spammy, in case there was any doubt. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , listing for the archives:
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, is it worth renaming this to Robbartbmillar? BTW, the first revision of their user talk is kind of spammy, in case there was any doubt. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, is it worth renaming this to Robbartbmillar? BTW, the first revision of their user talk is kind of spammy, in case there was any doubt. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, is it worth renaming this to Robbartbmillar? BTW, the first revision of their user talk is kind of spammy, in case there was any doubt. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Moved to oldest - don't think it's that important here since these appear to be spambots, but no harm in moving it. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)