Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rockingbeats/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Either socks or meats. See edit history of New York City Breakers and the brief discussion at User_talk:MrOllie UtherSRG (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Rockingbeats and Urbanhistory are ✅. DJFLEX-mk2 is possible.  Same urban area, one side on a wired connection, one on a mobile. I've indeffed the two confirmed accounts.   for DJFLEX. Courcelles (talk) 17:40, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * - UtherSRG (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In relation to, there is obviously (1 v 2) some form of offwiki coordination or connection between these accounts. In my view this does reach the threshold to be blockable, however I do acknowledge that a firm warning or time-limited block may be felt to be sufficient. - Please review and consider whether to block  for meatpuppetry in the circumstances. --Jack Frost (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked as suspected. Even if it’s meat, it’s not a defense. Case closed. Courcelles (talk) 03:35, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
More attempts to overwrite New York City Breakers with an unsourced, promotional version. MrOllie (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is technically ❌ with the previous listed accounts. Behavioural investigation might be more useful here. - Mailer Diablo 01:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I blocked them for the username and obvious COI. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 02:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)