Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rogerduckling24/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

As explained here, I believed behavioral evidence was strong enough to warrant a sockpupppetry block. The user is strong contesting this.

I am opening a separate investigation in case I've missed something. I would like to request CU evidence, although I get magic pixie dust, etc. Perhaps I've missed something and it's a strange coincidence. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Addendum here is my evidence: similar username ([word1][word2 lower-case][two-digits]). Similar user pages. Similar interest in lists of articles about world leaders. Similar interest in Australian geography and New South Wales. Similar edit summaries ("Added [XYZ]"). Uploaded the same copyright violation to Commons. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Technically ❌ - which does not mean that they can't possibly be sockpuppets, only that there isn't anything in common between their technical data. ST47 (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * you need to provide better (i.e. more specific) evidence. I'm not seeing any articles that both of them edited.  You say they've been uploading copyvios, but you need to give specific examples, otherwise I'm just groping around in the dark looking for evidence.  All I'm seeing is two people interested in Australian politics, but that's hardly proof of socking.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Not needed. I've unblocked the account. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I'm closing this. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)