Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rohith Kilari/Archive

23 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Rohith Kilari was indeffed for spamming [http:www.tollyspice.com tollyspice.com] into articles, like here and here. Rohith made an edit request here at Nannaku Prematho where he requested that we update the box office gross, based on a tollyspice.com reference.

Abhay Ram comes along two days later after page protection expires and updates the box office gross based on a tollyspice.com reference, commenting, "finally edited the right figures of Nannaku Prematho collections". Finally, eh? As if he'd tried before?

Abhay Ram has also been spamming tollyspice.com. and I'm clearly going to have to add this site to the blacklist. It's no major loss--the site has only been up since February 2016 per its about us page.

As of this report, the two accounts have one other intersection at Sardaar Gabbar Singh, which might be important if he comes back. I'm indeffing and tagging the sock and closing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

28 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Brand new user has, in the span of four edits, added tollyspice.com twice to articles and in edit requests. Rohith Kilari and the first sock, Abhay Ram were doing this. Tollyspice is your run-of-the-mill cookie-cutter blog for Indian cinema. I see sites like this several times a day. Nothing special. Because of Kilari and his socks, I've added it to the spam blacklist.

Tollyspice.com's About us page says that they began in February 2016, so it's highly unlikely that it's become so popular a website that it's now leaking into Wikipedia, unless we're talking about promotion. However, on the off-chance that Prasanth's edits were made in good faith, I would appreciate a quick CU. Thank you! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is . Also, is ✅ to the previous two accounts reported. Mike V • Talk 21:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)