Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rokabluecheese/Archive

18 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All accounts have food-related names and have vandalized Babaroga (company). None of them have made any other edits to any other articles except that one. See [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=prev&oldid=533630764], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=prev&oldid=533466153], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=519865517&oldid=519596813], and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&action=history the page history of Babaroga (company)]. The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs) 07:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Master and socks blocked and tagged. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

15 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The suspected accounts all vandalized Babaroga (company) with similar changes and have made no edits to other articles. RokaBlueCheese has already been confirmed as being a sockpuppet for other accounts. See [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=prev&oldid=534598395], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=next&oldid=534598460], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=next&oldid=534692387], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=next&oldid=534783196], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=next&oldid=535550275], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=next&oldid=535794440], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Babaroga_(company)&diff=next&oldid=535966882] Keeeeeper (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Normally a case as obvious as this wouldn't warrant a check, but since at first glance it appeared that the reporting user was the same as one of the socks, I ran the check. Anyway, all named accounts plus the accounts in the archive are ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing since everything is blocked and tagged. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)