Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romaansajid/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This user (User:Indic rumi) created an article Woojer Inc. that was previously deleted multiple times. Suddenly after few minutes of deletion this article, an old user (User:Romaansajid) registered in 2016 has published the same article with slightly change title (Woojer Inc) and same content. DMySon (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Romansaid is suspected of being a paid account to create an article about a company called Woojer.
 * Romaansajid created the promotional page Woojer Inc -- a duplicate of Draft:Woojer Inc. created by User:Indic rumi
 * Homepages of User:Romaansajid and User:Indic rumi are duplicates with same birthdate & location
 * Indic rumi previously created the same promotional page at Woojer
 * HapticTech and AliCe are other accounts whose only edits added Woojer articles, , and Woojer products to mainspace , . (See their deleted edits)
 * NOTE: A Woojer article was created in 2017 by User:SirEdimon whose name changed recently to User:Kacamata. SirEdimon was allowed to return with a SO in October 2018 after being indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. See Sockpuppet investigations/SirEdimon/Archive. I am currently unsure whether this new SPI relates to the older case. — Cactus Writer (talk) 17:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I was pinged, so I'll comment. For the sake of clarity, it was created at ACC, not OTRS, as noted in the log entry. This account appears to have been created 6 years ago and I, unsurprisingly, don't recall it at all. I'm not currently an account creator (been too busy with RL to keep it going lately), so I can't review the history of the ticket at the moment, nor would I be able to share anything publicly about it, in any case. If a CU wishes to inquire further regarding the ticket, I would suggest they contact an ACC tool admin. Best wishes all! Waggie (talk) 20:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Interesting thing here is that Romaansajid was created via a OTRS ticket by . I'm assuming that means they were behind an IP block so couldn't create their own account.  If found to be a sock, this case should be renamed to AliCe. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged Romaansajid and Indic rumi as socks, based on the near-identical texts of the Woojer pages, and shared interest in Government College Gujranwala. The other two blocked as UPE/Spam; clearly chasing the same commission, but different texts, so likely different people. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * PS: I don't see any particular reason to suspect / based on their current editing history. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
see edits to University of the Punjab, Gujranwala, overlap with as well as  who also created ClearPath Orthodontics, which this user has now recreated. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - the behavioural evidence is clear and the username similarity to removes any doubt. Please indef the sock. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * firefly ( t · c ) 10:47, 19 June 2022 (UTC)