Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romg10/Archive

18 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There's a whole lot of crazy and transparent AUTOBIO puffery in this article for Romail Gulzar, which is one thing. But masquerading at Articles for deletion/Romail Gulzar in an effort to save your article, as Kawasaki92 has just popped up to do, is another. LEHello is another SPA, if we end up blocking a sockpuppeteer. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * It's worth noting that an IP, 5.67.89.220, removed the AfD notice. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've added to the list of suspected puppets, above. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And now PagePK48 has popped up to edit Pukaar News and comment at Articles for deletion/Romail Gulzar. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - all promoting Romail Gulzar .  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * LEHello and Romg10 are ✅. Kawasaki92 appears to be ❌. . T. Canens (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * is a ✅ match to Romg10 and LEHello. T. Canens (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Romg10, LEHello, and PagePK48 blocked and tagged. Closing. Katietalk 19:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

22 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More SPAs popping up at Articles for deletion/Romail Gulzar. Note the misspelling of "article", identical to the spelling used by a previous suspect, Cordless Larry (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * HikingSam48 is . I've blocked and tagged the account based on behavior and the technical evidence.
 * Kawasaki92 and Mahimunda70 are ✅ to each other and ❌ to the master. I've blocked the two accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Bbb23. Did you mean to say that Kawasaki92 and Mahimunda70 are confirmed to each other? Cordless Larry (talk) 17:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks for noticing (fixed now). At least my blocks were correct.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No need to tag last two accounts/ Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)