Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ronald Wenonah/Archive

Evidence submitted by Philip Baird Shearer
Since User:Ronald Wenonah has been Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive647 warned about disruptive editing to the article War of 1812, a number of different comments have been left on the talk page by the above either making one edit supporting WP's POV or simply making one edit to the article talk page and no other edits. Seems like a DUCK to me. PBS (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Voucherman forgot to sign the edit and it was bot generated as 109.175.173.95 before Voucherman signed, as Voucherman has a small edit history and was using an address in the UK this may just be a coincidence, that (s)he made similar comments to the other accounts. -- PBS (talk)

Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Completely ❌ based on technical evidence. –MuZemike 00:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN X Man  12:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

08 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obviously this is the same editor based on similarity of name and edits. Ronald Wenonah has previously notified of an SPI, so should be aware of the rules of using multiple accounts. While the new account was not created for purposes of block or 3rr evasion, he should follow procedures in Changing username or change his signature. Note that the original account has a block history which does not appear under the new account. TFD (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I would let this issue go. Firstly, Rwenonah (talk) explained on my talk page that he forgot his password. Also, the name is so close to that originally used (Ronald Wenonah) that the new name is obviously not an attempt to evade scrutiny.HLGallon (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I concur with HLGallon. There is no overlap in editing dates and a forgotten password is a plausible excuse. I think it would be good for Rwenonah to mark the previous account as his, however. Unless there's more, I'll mark for close soon. TN X Man 17:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm in agreement with the others. Closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)