Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rooster Best/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Spamming of the articles for creation process. The all accounts have created drafts submitted to AfC with something along the lines of [Someone] is [something]. All accounts create one draft (except from the suspected master who creates two). All accounts create one draft which is negative towards a person in the one line format, with the insults being aimed at their mental ability / capability. The name of the person seems randomly picked and so not necessarily directed at someone (i.e. the last submission was for someone called "Albania Taiwan"). Rooster Best makes one draft which is positive about the same person he made their negative one about, but also in the same one line format. Also submissions tend to happen around the same time of day (Rooster Best and RTerrell03 both around 10 UTC yesterday and JImmywang429 around 12 UTC today). Seems likely some kind of joke by a person. The drafts are: I find it highly unlikely that the accounts wouldn't be linked, especially as they all use the same kind of format. The reason for CU check as if they are linked the person likes to use throwaway accounts, so it is possible they might have sleeper accounts. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 00:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Draft:Albania Taiwan by JImmywang429
 * Draft:John Clay Hai Hong by RTerrell03
 * Draft:Oscar Carberry and User:Rooster Best/sandbox by Rooster Best

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other, but to the above because they appear to be using a proxy:
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other, but ❌ to any of the above:
 * - note: this account doesn't seem to exist, but it sure is showing up in the CU log.
 * I'm just going to block the lot without tags, obviously a case of juvenile vandalism. No need to split this out into separate cases. Closing. ST47 (talk) 01:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other, but ❌ to any of the above:
 * - note: this account doesn't seem to exist, but it sure is showing up in the CU log.
 * I'm just going to block the lot without tags, obviously a case of juvenile vandalism. No need to split this out into separate cases. Closing. ST47 (talk) 01:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * - note: this account doesn't seem to exist, but it sure is showing up in the CU log.
 * I'm just going to block the lot without tags, obviously a case of juvenile vandalism. No need to split this out into separate cases. Closing. ST47 (talk) 01:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm just going to block the lot without tags, obviously a case of juvenile vandalism. No need to split this out into separate cases. Closing. ST47 (talk) 01:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)