Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roozie12/Archive

Evidence submitted by Dawnseeker2000
This brand new user (the account was created July 20th) is making some very strange, unhelpful, and even suspicious edits. On only their second edit ever with the account they stated (in an edit summary to a subpage off their talk page) "not roozie12 or roozie1219 or jacob1219".

Well lets see:


 * was blocked in march for Competence is required - I've never even seen that block reason given (Blocked sockmaster)
 * Also blocked in March for being a sock of User:Roozie12 (Blocked sock)
 * Blocked (Disruptive editing: Roozie12, still lacking the competence to contribute constructively) (Blocked sock)

What caught my eye today was this person editing the page of a recently blocked sock puppet (Urboogyman). That investigation of sock master Pickles0001 was just closed today. Why would a brand new user want to edit a page of a newly blocked user?

Some other strange edits include:


 * Notifying 87.82.10.6 about a test edit on Airblue that wasn't a test edit. The edit was valid and still stands. That IP user turned out to be a user who simply hadn't noticed that he was no longer logged in.
 * Their eighth ever edit was to their User:R1r1f2/monobook.js page.
 * Their ninth ever edit was to request speedy deletion of their own user page.
 * Their twelfth edit was to request speedy deletion of the Mars article. (!)
 * And their thirteenth edit was to request speedy deletion of the 2010 Japan Football League article.

What does all this mean. Well this looks like an incompetent and disruptive duck. Dawnseeker2000  02:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * All accounts are clearly related, all blocked &mdash; Despite the statement "i will stop". That me seem a bit harsh, but I don't think its likely that this user will ever provide positive utility. extransit (talk) 04:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Moved from /R1r1f2. T. Canens (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

01 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Roozie12 was indeffed for incompetence. This account...


 * Claims to have been born in both Indiana and China
 * Has excessive WikiProject userboxes on their userpage
 * Needlessly changes capitalization
 * Added an unsourced statement to the essential nutrient article based on another unsourced statement from the choline article
 * Changed the pronunciation of Wii from /ˈwiː/ to /ˈweeː/
 * Invited an IP vandal to join a WikiProject
 * Incorrect grammar
 * Other highly vague edits
 * ?

Other edits include creating an improperly-formatted LTA page for Roozie12, and tagging an account dormant since 2003 as a sock (he may have confused it for a test page, but that's still unnerving). Username also matches the pattern of other known Roozie12 socks. Dylan620 (t • c) 23:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' im sorry i have nothing to do with roozie12 Windowsfan1219 (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Convincing WP:DUCK. Blocked and tagged. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)