Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rosalinares1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar username. New suspected sock also continue the same disruptive editing behavior as Rosalinares1 by adding huge chunk of unsourced materials such as with this revision. Rosalinares1 was previously blocked for same disruptive editing which has since expired in which user started doing the same thing (replacing the sourced content with unsourced content) after the block expired. I'm not sure if there are more accounts other than Rosalinares123.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  07:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There is no chronological overlap between the accounts - the user may have just lost their password and created a new account. The old account is not currently blocked (their 72-hour block expired before the new account was created), so there is no block evasion. I assume from the usernames that they are the same person, but there's no evidence that they have broken the sockpuppetry policy.  Girth Summit  (blether)  10:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
was created in 2021 and is currently blocked for a week due to their disruptive edits to DKZ, but the account was created in 2019 has suddenly reappeared after five months of inactivity. This user is evading their block and may have other sleepers laying around that warrants a check. ✗ plicit  15:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Given the names, there really wasn't any doubt, but I ran a check anyway for sleepers, which I didn't find. Given that Rosalinares1 had previously been blocked for disruptive editing, after which they created Rosalinares123, I'm indeffing both as ✅. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)