Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rosguill 6/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rosguill&diff=prev&oldid=1018840536 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rosguill&diff=prev&oldid=1018840639 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rosguill&diff=prev&oldid=1018840797 Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is Denizgezmis557761; we already had Rosguill two through five a few days back and blocked some ranges, but this mole is hard to whack.  – if it hasn't been done already. Not too hopeful for sleepers because creations are usually sequential, but maybe an additional rangeblock is possible. In any case, this will likely need a merge. No tags for this one please. .  Blablubbs&#124;talk 09:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Throw in Blablubbs 3 as well. They're all CU confirmed and I blocked another range. Drmies (talk)
 * How charming! Thanks for the check. Closing and leaving it up to the reviewing clerk whether to merge this or just G6 it per WP:DENY; not like he's hard to spot. Blablubbs&#124;talk 14:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)