Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rowdypup/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User is on final warning for continuing nonsensical changes making Martha (a female name, referred to as "girl" in the show and voiced by a woman) a male dog in List of Martha Speaks episodes, List of Martha Speaks characters and Martha Speaks (TV series). IP has arrived for more of the same.

(A heads up: Make sure you have a permit if you are going to block this one.) Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Added 2602:306:CCA8:5E29:44A9:446C:F3D2:4D48. I realize the IPs will be stale. This case is to establish a record for Rowdypup for likely future instances. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 01:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I suggest to add User:2602:306:CCA8:5E29:152E:F11B:377A:BD13 to the list of possible sockpuppets. Where one of the IP claimed the need of a permit, this IP claimed for vandalizing a perfectly normal thing for do apparent reason that is going to a good cause (I guessed that he is unhappy that I reverted his unexplained removal of content that was replaced by unsourced content full of links to disambiguation pages.) That claim is made here on Angry Birds Transformers, where (...)4D48 was also active, together with User:2602:306:CCA8:5E29:E455:F4B3:617E:77DA with the same type of edit here (most likely stale, so not added to the list). The Banner talk 13:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * So handy when they confirm it themselves: . The Banner talk 16:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Admin action needed - The /64 range, 2602:306:CCA8:5E29::/64, can be blocked safely; I'd recommend two weeks to begin. Thanks. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 02:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Per username similarities, and making the same kinds of disruptive edits to the same pages. . 2602:306:CCA8:5E29::/64 was blocked in the past due to being used by Rowdypup, but after the block expired the range is still clearly being used by the same banned user. Sro23 (talk) 21:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'm not using sockpuppetry, I'm just trying to help our wondrous site grow, but my old account was permanently blocked, forcing me to make a new one  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rustypup (talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New user, registered the day after the previous sock Rustypup was blocked. Editor has focused on children's shows (As have the last socks) and returned to the disruptive edit warring on Angry Bird articles. See Angry Birds POP!, Angry Birds Seasons. -- ferret (talk) 22:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock indeffed. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The IP given as the sockmaster is only one of many. Currently, is blocked by  using, but I don't think IP ranges work with SPI reports. A comparison of this edit by the IP user and this edit by the logged-in user shows a clear connection. Obviously, no CU is needed for two reasons: One, this involves an IP address, and, two, this connection is as clear as day.  — Gestrid  ( talk ) 04:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Guys, all I want to do is edit or beloved Wikipedia with no worries and happy as a lark.....guess not :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintend01 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP range already blocked.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)