Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Royalmate1/Archive

27 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Elohim55 was created less than a day after Royalmate1's indefinite block and UTRS unblock decline. Here Elohin55 expressed discontent with the block. Also note the similarities with the attitude towards escalating blocks. (Royalmate1, compare to the previous Elohin55 diff) Elohim55 expresses the same attitude towards administrators as Royalemate1. Both accounts also made quite morbid comments about other users. (Elohin55, Royalmate1) Finally, Royalmate1 was upset that RHaworth removed copyright infringements from his userspace. Elohin55's personal attack (in the previous diff) was targeted to RHaworth and he also removed an award that was given to him. Mike V • Talk 16:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Mike V • Talk 16:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. Courcelles (talk) 16:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I've blocked the sock and updated the block for the master account. Mike V • Talk 16:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

29 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK user name. See also comment on user page about "admin vandals"  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 02:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked and tagged. Mike V • Talk 02:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

24 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK. See edits and user name  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 18:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending_yourself_against_claims This account isn't a sockpuppet. Unblock Royalmate1.]

Not a sockpuppet. User deleted my comments, thus they have committed vandalism. Royalmate4 (talk) 18:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

" Any and all admins who have blocked this user must immediately have their adminships revoked, for they are abusing the system in a conspiracy against Royalmate1 so that his work here on Wikipedia is destroyed. I call in to question not only the sockpuppetry charges, of which none are valid, and also any other wrongful charge against the user User:Royalmate1, as well as the competency of any admins, checkusers, or other users thereof that a part of this conspiracy. I demand immediately the removal of all charges and blocks against the user in question as well as the other false sockpuppet accounts. Legal action against the Wikimedia Foundation may be taken if this conspiracy is taken any further. Royalmate4 (talk) 17:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC) "
 * No legal threats, so please strike that sentence. I just asked Drmies for a quick DUCK block of this account on his page, but this SPI is okay too. Please note that we are supposed to WP:AGF, but AGF is not a suicide pact, and with the amount of evidence (including your user page) it's pretty evident that you're RM1. This is really obvious sock-puppetry, and there is no cabal. Origamiteⓣⓒ 21:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * They're already blocked. Thanks Origamite--let's move on. Drmies (talk) 21:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yep, that's him alright. Everything looks all set here. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 00:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)