Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rtt11/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First account, Srivers26 starts the article and contests the article whereas the second account then removes the speedy, which qualifies for an altogether too questionable case considering this is such a new article. Although first account longer list of contribs, it can't be a random coincidence. SwisterTwister  talk  04:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

In case it helps, I see that was  of the deletion of a page they created, Stephanie Pilavin (hence the origin of Spilavin?).  General Ization  Talk   22:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Please look at the blocks and the userpages of these two accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * - GABgab 02:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * These two accounts were blocked as socks of . I am not sure of the precise circumstances of the block, so pinging for context. GABgab 02:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't like having a case with an unregistered account as the master. In any event, such an account can't be blocked. Reluctantly closing for the record. My understanding is that Materialscientist has notifications turned off, in which case your ping never reached him.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Why is unregistered account named as a master?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * . Materialscientist (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I moved the page to reflect the new username.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)