Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rtuftrbsee/Archive

05 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same types of edits on same pages. WP:DUCK EvergreenFir (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Definitely something very odd here. Two "unrelated editors"? Nah. Some striking similarities: Looks like a nest here. Probably best to CU. -- HighKing ++ 16:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Both user accounts created a little over an hour apart - on 4th March 2014
 * Both accounts lie dormant for over a month before being used.
 * Both account names look like they were picked from a random username generator
 * Rtuftrbsee stops editing on 4th May. 23hours later, Riloratdrenf starts to edit.
 * On 1st May, Rtuftrbsee and User:EvergreenFir get into a couple of reversions on a series of articles. Rtuftrbsee reverts EvergreenFir 15 times on as many articles in the space of 25 minutes.  EvergreenFir posts a couple of times on the Talk page to get an explanation but gets no response. He then posts a vandalism warning to Rtuftrbsee's Talk page.  Within a minute, Rtuftrbsee posts a retaliatory vandalism warning on EvergreenFir's Talk page.  An hour later, Rtuftrbsee is blocked by admin User:Darkwind.
 * On 4th May Rtuftrbsee resumes editing but is warned once again by EvergreenFir. Rtuftrbsee stop editing.
 * On 5th May, Riloratdrenf starts editing. To date, has made a total of 6 edits - one the same revert on EvergreenFir's edit to Georgians.
 * I have added User:Mtrerfowp to this SPI also. Same characteristics in terms of name choice.  Account created between the times of the Rtuftrbsee and Riloratdrenf creation times.  Also editing in the same topic area, same styles, also reverting.  Has also edited Uralvagonzavod, same as Rtuftrbsee.
 * I have also added User:Siewrctesdr to this SPI. Same reasons - account created within an hour of Rtuftrbsee, same overlaps in topic areas, reversions, etc.
 * I have also added User:Edrnxifobr. Same, etc.

Hmmm - looking even further, theres also this SPI - any those users share a lot of the same characteristics as these. Same seemingly random usernames. -- HighKing ++ 17:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Editing overlaps between the editors on both SPI reports include:
 * Afmatpesr and Riloratdrenf Egyptian Air Force
 * Mafintieyu and Mtrerfowp User talk:Subtropical-man
 * Mafintieyu, Doraslam4809, Afmatpesr and Mtrerfowp List of tallest buildings in Europe


 * User:Mtrerfowp and User:Mafintieyu and User:Afmatpesr are sock-puppets (or one is sock-masters) in 100%, to this there is no doubt. This page is purely formal, we wait for confirmation from checkuser. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   20:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Only Rtuftrbsee as sockmaster and sock-puppets: Riloratdrenf, Siewrctesdr, Mtrerfowp, Edrnxifobr? Where is
 * They also are a sockpuppets. User HighKing also wrote about this above. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * They also are a sockpuppets. User HighKing also wrote about this above. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * They also are a sockpuppets. User HighKing also wrote about this above. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * They also are a sockpuppets. User HighKing also wrote about this above. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I analyzes exactly editions by
 * (note: on 100% is sockpuppet)
 * (note: on 100% is sockpuppet)
 * (note: on 100% is sockpuppet)
 * (note: on 100% is sockpuppet)
 * (note: there is a certain probability)
 * considering period of edits, account creation date, nick-style (Doraslam4809, Papssews23, Faukntordhdte, Sopiknfram), style of edits/talks, edits in articles where sock-master or other sockpuppets works before or later, supports (reverts, poll etc) for his other sockpuppets, all shows that these few users (Doraslam4809, Papssews23, Faukntordhdte, Sopiknfram) also are sockpuppets (and maybe Crossswords - there is a certain probability). PS. Propably sockpuppets uses the dynamic IP address of 41.xxx.xx.x. Also see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gbgfbgfbgfb and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gbgfbgfbgfb, in my opinion this is the same person as these sockspuppets. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe a CU should uncover all related accounts including IP addresses. Probably a good idea to link the two SPI reports.   -- HighKing ++ 22:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Also sockpuppet (account create today):
 * (note: on 100% is sockpuppet).
 * , we have a big problem with that person and the new sockpuppets, Other users also it noted, see: Talk:List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Europe. New edit-wars, quarrels etc, I can not withstand. Please you do something. These are the next sockpuppets, only work to further reverts like as other its sockpuppets / masterpuppet.  Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * (response to Bbb23) - Mtrerfowp is master or only sockpuppet, this person has too many sockpuppets. Generally, these both pages should be connected. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   19:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * - blocked 1 week as sockmaster, Riloratdrenf Siewrctesdr Mtrerfowp Edrnxifobr blocked indef. Leaving case open to allow a clerk or CU to decide if a followup CU is necessary. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * and also indef blocked as puppet accounts.  does not share the same naming pattern, nor the habit of editing each other's talk pages, so I have taken no action at this time. Still awaiting final decision on CU. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * , you blocked Mtrerfowp as a suspected puppet of Rtuftrbsee. At the same time, has opened another report, Sockpuppet investigations/Mtrerfowp, with Mtrerfowp as the master. Just so you know, Mtrerfowp is the older account by about one hour. This needs to be straightened out.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I have merged that report into this one and left Rtuftrbsee as the master (as I am not after re-tagging all of the socks that have already been blocked, and it makes very little difference which one we call the master when it seems they're on track to end up indeffed anyway). Also, I'm retagging as since additional information has been provided. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 10:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

11 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets



These three accounts are suspected to falsification of discussion and voting (in Talk:List of tallest buildings in European) and edit-war and pushing very controversial version (in List of tallest buildings in Europe). These accounts are new, create in March and April. This new version of article favoring Moscow (very big picture of Moscow and remove all other pictures of cities from article), presenting Amsterdam as main finance center of Europe (totally nonsense) and delete three some cities from intro and also three skyscrapers from list, pushing version by one or two Russians and his two/three sockpuppets. This such a complex and strange change is still restored as a consensus by user Mtrerfowp and Papssews23 and Doraslam4809. Doraslam4809 is clearly sockpuppet because this account has few edits only in List of tallest buildings in Europe and Talk:List of tallest buildings in Europe and nothing more. Subtropical -man <span style="display:inline-block; margin-bottom:-0.3em; vertical-align:-0.4em; line-height:1.2em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;"> talk  <abbr class="abbr" title="intermediate level of English" > (en-2)   21:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Also sockpuppets by this person from Sockpuppet investigations/Rtuftrbsee
 * (note: sockpuppet - blocked)
 * (note: sockpuppet - blocked)
 * (note: sockpuppet - blocked)
 * (note: sockpuppet - blocked)
 * (note: sockpuppet - blocked)
 * (note: suspected sockpuppet - to blocked)
 * (note: suspected sockpuppet - to blocked)
 * (note: sockpuppet - blocked)
 * (note: suspected sockpuppet - to blocked)
 * (note: there is a certain probability)


 * More informations:
 * Sockpuppet_investigations/Rtuftrbsee
 * Talk:List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Europe
 * Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rtuftrbsee#Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Subtropical -man <span style="display:inline-block; margin-bottom:-0.3em; vertical-align:-0.4em; line-height:1.2em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;"> talk  <abbr class="abbr" title="intermediate level of English" > (en-2)   20:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You should look for links with:
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gbgfbgfbgfb
 * Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gbgfbgfbgfb

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Sockpuppet_investigations/Rtuftrbsee
 * Talk:List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Europe

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
See my comments at Sockpuppet investigations/Rtuftrbsee.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Checkuser comments: These results apply to all of the usernames on these multiple requests; I thinK I've included them all. The following are :

The following are socks of each other and  socks of the above group:

The following are socks of each other and  socks of the above groups:

As well:
 * is
 * is ❌ to all of the above. Risker (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)