Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/S201050066/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
User only has two edits, has a username that resembles another user's (compare DreamGuy 2.O with Tenryuu 2.O), and linked to an article rather than my userpage, like this one by S201050066. Granted, it's not a lot to go on, but the behavioural stuff is a little suspicious.

(Added 13:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)) Singularity42 had made a similar report, and I'll replicate it here as more activity has been made since this one's submission. It has been altered for better formatting: — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Seemed like a pretty obvious duck even without Checkuser. I just made my own report (which I removed after seeing this report).  Checkuser might have been useful to see if there are any sleepers as this editor has a history of socking, but I see it was declined. Singularity42 (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - All the other accounts are . --Jack Frost (talk) 21:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It turns out in this case, "probably stale" means, "you gotta have the right colored glasses to see the data". DG2 is ✅ (but Tenryuu 2.O did indeed go stale just a few days ago). -- RoySmith (talk) 16:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User_talk:S201050066_number_10 is copy/paste of stuff from S201050066's page — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per WP:DUCK before I saw this report.-- Ponyo bons mots 19:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Re-inserting Canadian provinces into a global page. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Added another sockpuppet, but this can be archived, as both editors above have been blocked. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I suppose this messy filing should be moved to Sockpuppet investigations/S201050066. Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. For the record, is  to the master, along with . . Tagged, closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 12:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
IP addresses have joined a discussion on Andykatib's page, which happen to have the same writing style as the suspected sockmaster, S201050066: compare this comment from one of the IPs to a comment from 201050066. There's also nonsense about our personal information being exposed in an edit summary, but a quick glance at the article's history shows that isn't the case. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 17:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC) — Tenryuu 🐲  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 17:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks . I wasn’t sure if the IP address was S20105066 or someone else but thanks for taking action. Andykatib (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Update: The two quickly-reverted edits on this page made by one of the IPs above pretty much confirms it. — Tenryuu 🐲  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Update: Added another IP in the range. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * --Blablubbs (talk) 13:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * - Please, consider a short anon. only block for . Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I blocked the range for a while. Seems to largely be used by this user lately. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Many DUCK socks popped up today, requesting CU for sleepers since I will inevitably miss some. Schminnte &#91;talk to me&#93; 15:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing seen that isn't locked. Spicy (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
accusing a user of reverting their edits as S201050066 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tenryuu&diff=prev&oldid=1217623139, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tenryuu&diff=next&oldid=1217623139, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tenryuu&diff=prev&oldid=1217622890 Star action  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Staraction I will sue you 20 thousand dollars 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu you should also stop attacking us 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Andykatib you should also stop aswell 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu and Andykatib Bedivere do you want to get sued to 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Staraction Allright we are going to sue you Andykatib and Bedivere Tenryuu now 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Staraction Allright we are going to sue you Andykatib Tenryuu and Bedivere now S201050066 number 45.4 (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu good luck trying to stop us 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Andykatib stop attacking us again 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Staraction stop attacking us aswell 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Bedivere stop attacking us your little friend is going to come back to play with you 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu stop attacking me 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu we will not be silcened anymore 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu we will never stop 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tenryuu we will never stop 2001:56B:3FEF:7D18:0:47:F4D3:DF01 (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Well that's a little mean and mercurial, seeing as how you thank Andykatib for taking your side. — Tenryuu 🐲  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I think S201050066 is throwing another one of his playground tantrums. Have told him not to mistake empathy for sympathy for his misbehaviour. He truly needs to move on from Wikipedia. His actions aren't going to win him sympathy points among the Wikipedia community nor end his permanent ban. I hope he realizes that one day. Andykatib (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * S201050066 has gotten in touch. He claims that his friend Dragovich, who is also a video game character from Call of Duty: Black Ops, got hold of the IP addresses and sockpuppet account in the most recent incident. Personally I don't buy his story because the writing style and editing behaviour resembles his previous edit warring patterns. I think we will just have to remain vigilant. Andykatib (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
 * Adding a new IP address,, who is bargaining to be on good terms in exchange for unprotecting the COVID-19 timeline pages and putting back the material they want on there. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * S201050066 also posted a similar message on my talk page. I told him that the Ontario data does not belong in the COVID-19 timeline pages and that the pages will remain protected as long as the edit warring and block evasion continues. It's an insincere apology since he doesn't recognise the wrong he has done and still wants to do the edits that got him banned in the first place. Andykatib (talk) 01:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for your advice. I understand that communicating with S201050066 via social media is risky. Still, I think I could use the social media platform we are on as a way of trying to talk sense into him. The banned user has autism. Speaking as someone who as Asperger's syndrome, I know of autistic people like my brother would have not let their condition define them. I agree with and  that the user should grow up and move beyond Wikipedia. Andykatib (talk) 02:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
They're all blocked now--throw in User:S201050066 number 45.4 as well. Note: the accounts mentioned here are confirmed to each other, not to any other accounts. I got nothing to say on the IP, of course, except they should grow up. Drmies (talk) 23:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I blocked the IP range again., I can't control what you do off-wiki, but it does not seem to me that communicating with this user on other platforms is a good idea. Spicy (talk) 01:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)