Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/S33k4ndd3str0y/Archive

Report date January 15 2010, 18:53 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC) NO it wasn't intentional. If you look at the edits of each account you will notice similiarities. all are writing proclaiming their love for tit's and editing the same pages. It is a education facility so it is possible they are meatpuppets as well. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Was it intentional not to supply any evidence? Please say what abuse you're claiming here and what evidence you have. Thanks. Rhomb (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users


 * OK, thanks for that. In this case I don't really think it rises to the level of sockpuppetry, just trivial vandalism.   had already been blocked and the IPs can be schoolblocked if necessary.  I think AIV for this sort of thing: it's not as if they were !vote-stacking or evading 3RR.  Rhomb (talk) 07:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Requested by Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

per clear behavioral evidence. No CU necessary. –MuZemike 22:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

None of the IPs have edited since yesterday. In addition, KBPI is already semi-protected, so there's nothing much else to do here. Let us know if any of the IPs in that range start up again. –MuZemike 22:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions