Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SD0001/Archive

15 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User is editing on the pseudo-IP address listed as second sock that they have been connected with on the main's User page. There is no valid justification as I understand under WP:SOCK for this user to be editing repeatedly as an IP (including having a very significant knowledge and viewpoint that a regular IP editor should not have) Hasteur (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The IP is likely a reset based on the fact that the known previous IP alt of the master is within the same IP rangeblock (103.6.156.1 - 103.6.159.255) as the current incarnation. Hasteur (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * H-hold on... SD0001 requested a block for 2 years! If he wants to edit Wikipedia again, but under a new name/IP, he could have requested a clean start.... There has to be a reason he asked his account to be blocked, and I don't think it's just to evade... Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 04:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * DL9C was blocked a while back. SD0001 is not currently blocked, but also not being used. There is no prohibition against a registered and unblocked user editing from his IP, so what exactly are you accusing him of? Someguy1221 (talk) 08:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm accusing him of editing while logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please observe how the IPs that I'm pointing out have proposed (1 and 2) modifications to CSD:G13 that clearly exhibit knowledge of very deep level Wikipedia processes.  IPs have pointed back to the DL9C acct (and they are in the exact same dynamic IP assignment).  The DL9C account was blocked as a sockpuppet of SD0001, ergo either SD0001 needs to post on their account and take responsibility for their actions, or they need to be prohibited from posting at all by a rangeblock on the IPs and a block on the master account. Hasteur (talk) 11:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Checkuser comment: No evidence of abusive behaviour given (the two IPs are taking pretty much opposite positions at WT:CSD, if nothing else). No checks done, no basis for doing one. Risker (talk) 00:56, 8 July 2015 (UTC)