Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SEFPRODUCTIONS/Archive

21 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating a page that was also created by Paul Easter. Seems likely. Wgolf (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I'll also agree that there seems to be some socking going on here. I'm going to add a few more people to be checked out, as they seem to be SPAs. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, the first one for this seems to be User:SEFPRODUCTIONS, but they've been blocked already as a promotional name. I think I've got all of them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm adding SEFPRODUCTIONS to the list just to have it checked. I do want to note that so far all of the accounts have denied being Easter and I will presume that they would also deny being the same person or related to one another. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The currently re-created articles were identical to those created by the puppeteer account. All contain unreferenced biographical data (e.g. birth date, descriptions of early childhood), as do many of the repeated additions by subsequent sock accounts. Puppeteer account User:Devadee and one of the IP socks also have a habit of blanking articles to avoid prod and AFD. I can provide diffs if necessary.  Ruby   Murray  07:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Just to confirm, I'm not a sock puppet. However, I did see and I came to the Paul Easter page via a link from Paul. I tried to make edits in a grammatical and syntactical capacity. I'm not arguing with the facts on the Paul T T Easter page. However, I also attempted to include references. I am new to this - I haven't got a userpage. If you want to message me, please do so. I am based in Dublin, Ireland. My pertinent biographical deets are available in a private capacity. If I did not adhere to the ts n cs on Wikipedia, my apologies. Stay in touch and please keep me apprised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heraclitus G (talk • contribs) 09:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I did sign off with my username there (simply typing Heraclitus G rather than linking to anywhere). Can you actually confirm the details on the IMdB credits? http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2428088/?ref_=tt_ov_st
 * Easter's film career is accurate in his Wiki bio, according to IMdB. So why was the entire entry removed, rather than just the facts detailing childhood? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heraclitus G (talk • contribs) 09:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You're supposed to sign with four tildes ( ~ ) or it will show up as unsigned. As far as IMDb goes, that can be used to show some small details such as movies, but it can't back up major details. If you have any other questions about details like that, feel free to ask on my talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Why not put Easter's other 5000 Facebook friends https://www.facebook.com/paul.easter.37 on the list along with over 4000 likes on this profile page https://www.facebook.com/paultt.easter. As all edits of this Paul T T Easter article came from his friends trying to add updates most have no knowledge for editing or how to edit on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.120.64 (talk) 21:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've moved this down into the proper area. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In any case, we aren't listing any of them because firstly, they haven't edited on the article. Secondly, this was created because the editing style was sufficiently similar enough to warrant suspicion. This is not the right way to go about getting attention for your work, Mr. Easter. Wikipedia shenanigans are largely ignored by the general media public. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've indeffed and tagged all the named accounts based on duck. Admittedly, it is possible that (1) there is meat puppetry going on (2) some accounts are related and some are not, or (3) a combination of (1) and (2), but the disruptive behavior warrants blocks regardless. A CU could be done later if needed, but I would not unblock even if some accounts weren't puppets - I would just untag. I did nothing with the IPs as they have not edited in several days.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Due to the unblock request by Heraclitus G, I ran checks on these accounts. ✅:
 * is and  is technically ❌. These results, of course, don't rule out meatpuppetry. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've changed the tags on the confirmed accounts. I've removed the tag from Heraclitus G's user page and asked them some questions in response to their unblock request. I left the suspected tag on Bradwallactor's user page, punting as I wasn't sure what the right course of action is on a finding of inconclusive. Sounds wishy-washy to me (smile), so I left the wishy-washy tag. They haven't made an unblock request, so I'm not that concerned.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is and  is technically ❌. These results, of course, don't rule out meatpuppetry. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've changed the tags on the confirmed accounts. I've removed the tag from Heraclitus G's user page and asked them some questions in response to their unblock request. I left the suspected tag on Bradwallactor's user page, punting as I wasn't sure what the right course of action is on a finding of inconclusive. Sounds wishy-washy to me (smile), so I left the wishy-washy tag. They haven't made an unblock request, so I'm not that concerned.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is and  is technically ❌. These results, of course, don't rule out meatpuppetry. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've changed the tags on the confirmed accounts. I've removed the tag from Heraclitus G's user page and asked them some questions in response to their unblock request. I left the suspected tag on Bradwallactor's user page, punting as I wasn't sure what the right course of action is on a finding of inconclusive. Sounds wishy-washy to me (smile), so I left the wishy-washy tag. They haven't made an unblock request, so I'm not that concerned.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Closing, nothing else needs to be done here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

07 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

block evasion:
 * CarterRJ - first edit was to re-create Paul T T Easter as Paul T T Easter (Film Maker).
 * Wayne Ives - first edit was to re-create Stagger (film 2009) as Gangster film Stagger. Ruby   Murray  09:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Wayne Ives was blocked indefinitely this morning as a sockpuppet. Ruby   Murray  15:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Dave Simson - first edit was to re-create Stagger (film 2009) as Stagger (film).  Ruby   Murray  15:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All ✅, and there are no unblocked accounts. Yet. Unfortunately, he has hopped to a busy mobile network, so a rangeblock isn't going to be practical. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

10 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of Assignment (film), another SEFPRODUCTIONS film. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Tagged, it was already blocked. Closing now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

15 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Only edits were to re-create U Mugs (2012), originally created by confirmed sock. Text this time was not about that film but about Paul T T Easter, deleted at recent AfD. JohnCD (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked per WP:DUCK. May be a meatpuppet rather than sock, but makes no difference. Reported for the record. JohnCD (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

23 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

recreation of PAUL TERRY THOMAS EASTER WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

26 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blocked ducks. Just adding to the record. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

27 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block evasion.
 * SimonWEBBSTER: first edit was to create 2010FeatureFilm, about the Paul Easter film Stagger. Ruby   Murray  17:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Vincewoods: first edit was to create User talk:Vincewoods, a draft version of a new Stagger article. Ruby   Murray  19:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus, and a whole flock of DUCK-blocked accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

30 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created Luap Restsae twice, which I just deleted as G4 of Articles for deletion/Paul T T Easter and salted. The images uploaded to Commons are marked for speedy as well. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I blocked Carla Morris as a duck along with:
 * is another obvious sock. Since the last report resulted in some sleepers being found, I changed this request to a CU request to look for more sleepers. The autoblock is obviously not working. Is a range block feasible or is the ISP range too active (I suspect so)? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is another obvious sock. Since the last report resulted in some sleepers being found, I changed this request to a CU request to look for more sleepers. The autoblock is obviously not working. Is a range block feasible or is the ISP range too active (I suspect so)? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is another obvious sock. Since the last report resulted in some sleepers being found, I changed this request to a CU request to look for more sleepers. The autoblock is obviously not working. Is a range block feasible or is the ISP range too active (I suspect so)? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is another obvious sock. Since the last report resulted in some sleepers being found, I changed this request to a CU request to look for more sleepers. The autoblock is obviously not working. Is a range block feasible or is the ISP range too active (I suspect so)? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is another obvious sock. Since the last report resulted in some sleepers being found, I changed this request to a CU request to look for more sleepers. The autoblock is obviously not working. Is a range block feasible or is the ISP range too active (I suspect so)? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * - King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In this case, the deleted edits are evidence enough for me. ✅:
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All are already blocked, so there's not much to be done other than tagging. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

31 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block evasion. First edit was to create Defensive tactics, a bio of Paul TT Easter. Ruby  Murray  08:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have added for the record two others already blocked, whose only edits were to create Easter T T Paul and Easter TT Paul. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Please do an IP check. If this guy is using one IP address consistently then a block on it is fully justified. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I second this. If it's predominantly 1-3 IPs, I'd recommend blocking all of them. Part of what makes all of this so bad is that they're creating these under various titles that wouldn't immediately show that it's about Easter. I remember seeing a few of them that didn't specifically mention his name at all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:12, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not able to run any checks at the moment, but from experience with recent socks, he's operating from a busy mobile network, so IP/rangeblocks are probably not going to be possible. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Enter at your own risk blocked per WP:DUCK; other two already blocked. I will leave this for a CU to decide whether it is worth a check for sleepers. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * - for a sleeper check. Rschen7754 20:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Named accounts are ✅ plus:
 * has not edited, but is ✅.
 * Even though these accounts occupy a narrow range, it is too busy for me to be comfortable with blocking it. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * All blocked, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Even though these accounts occupy a narrow range, it is too busy for me to be comfortable with blocking it. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * All blocked, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

02 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Again with the Paul T T Easter nonsense, this time as Paul Thomas Terrence Easter. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Editor has been blocked, marking this for closure. --  At am a  頭 21:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

04 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Just deleted Here and There film. And I quote: P A U L E A S T E R  IS LAUGHING AT WIKIPEDIA § FreeRangeFrog  croak 19:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
...and Wikipedia is sighing wearily at Paul Easter. Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. I have marked this as closed because I see no point in a sleeper check - he creates throwaway accounts a few minutes before posting. JohnCD (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

22 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New creation of P.T.T. Easter WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked and page speedied. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

21 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another seemingly randomly named article about Paul Easter - this time Suffolk film director Nthep (talk) 14:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked and tagged - closing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

21 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created Paul Easter (Actor/FilmMaker), which I have tagged for speedy deletion per G4. Everymorning  talk  15:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Recentchanges100 and are now blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Accounts tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk 19:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Two more: and  ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * One more (sorry, last minute) . Already blocked. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

27 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of (Actor) Paul Easter WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * CU would be useful here, there are usually some sleepers with this socker. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock is blocked and tagged by . Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, worth checking for sleepers.
 * Everyone (on this range) is already blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

27 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Promoting the work of Paul Easter in a very similar writing style, and the first draft of the new Paul Easter article contained the same kind of rant against Wikipedia editors as was made by SEFPRODUCTIONS, as well as lots of firsthand "Easter said...". McGeddon (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and Churchofgood are now blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * All tagged and bagged. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Two socks are blocked and tagged. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

27 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block evasion. First edit was to create (Actor/Filmmaker) Dai Pritchard (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock is blocked and tagged. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

28 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another one making Paul Easter Wgolf (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both blocked and tagged. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * See below. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

28 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Yep again! Wgolf (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

And another one, based on Paul_Easter_(Actor,Producer,Filmmaker...) Combie (talk - contribs) 23:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Hello, this user keeps creating an article about Paul Easter, that has been deleted muilply times, and the user(s) have been removing the speedy deletion tag. Please block these users, they are operated by the same person, trying to recreate this article. I recommend protecting the page Paul Easter and Paul Easter (actor) from being created. This guy is spamming Wikipedia! Thank you Wgolf!  CookieMonster755  (talk)   22:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Maybe time to consider putting something on MediaWiki:Titleblacklist? Looks like there's already a suitable regexp on there for another socking, self-promoting filmmaker. --McGeddon (talk) 22:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * -just submitted it! Wgolf (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank-you!  CookieMonster755  (talk)   22:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts and . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags have been updated. Closing. Mike V • Talk 01:17, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

02 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation (Dick) and attempted rescue (Dave) of Paul (eggy) Easter (Film Maker) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dick657Tap and Davekipps34 ✅ and blocked. For someone who claims to be "not interested in being on Wikipedia" (admin only), he sure is being persistent about creating pages here. Leaving open in case more accounts show up today. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Per DoRD's comment above, I've re-opened the case for the time being. Mike V • Talk 23:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry. It was already "tommorow" here in the Central European time zone .  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I think that this can be put away now. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

11 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * Added later
 * Added later


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ungrammatically talking up the films of Paul Easter, making similar edits to previous socks User:Rob34v287 and User:David56KTL (all minor edits, adding "a Paul Easter film" to Stagger in Rita Ramnani's filmography despite no other list entry mentioning a director, describing it as "Paul Easter's gangster film" in James Fisher (actor)). McGeddon (talk) 11:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure.
 * Rita Ramnani article: LizGreener adds an entry namechecked as "a Paul Easter film" to Ramnani's filmography (in a list that otherwise just names films, not directors), confirmed sockpuppet David56KTL made the same emphasis last month. The mention of Easter's film in this article was removed as block evasion yesterday.
 * Black dog ghosts in popular culture article: LizGreener inserts "Paul Easter" into the description of a film, confirmed sockpuppet Robv34v287 did the same last month.
 * James Fisher article: LizGreener adds that Fisher appeared in "Paul Easter's gangster film Stagger", the same information having been removed as block evasion yesterday, and tweaked by SEFPRODUCTIONS socks David56KTL ("Paul Easter's British...") and Rob34v287 (wikilinking) in the past.
 * Hadn't noticed when I filed this SPI, but as stated, two of this user's three edits (and their only edits to Wikipedia since joining) are directly restoring WP:BLOCKEVASION removals applied the day before. --McGeddon (talk) 12:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * (VFY237Carp) Duck: first edit was to create Stagger (movie), a Paul Easter film. Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, cuould you, please, provide some diffs to show similarities between LizGreener and SEFPRODUCTIONS?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The mention of Paul Easter was enough for me. LizGreener is ✅ plus . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The refactoring of my earlier comments after VFY237Carp was added makes this seem a bit ambiguous. Suffice it to say, though, that these are all ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've reblocked all the accounts to remove talk page access, because the next thing they do is create them with the usual "Paul Easter" bio material. We should be doing that for all of them as they show up, it's not like they're going to appeal the blocks. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

12 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same minor edit castlist addition of Paul Easter to the same article as the confirmed sock User:JamesrushHYU yesterday. (1, 2) McGeddon (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Very quackily blocked. Same as the three previous ones. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged. Closing the case. Reopen if new socks appear.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

13 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Looks to be another sock and this one is a WP:DUCK. He's tried creating another article for Easter, so it'd be worth checking for sleepers. I've blocked and tagged this one, but I'd like to add it here just to have it as part of the record. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅: 777555QWR and SixShark plus . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 03:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * All re-tagged and last one blocked. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

13 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More socking block evasion to promote the work of Paul Easter. Creating When you owe (film) about one of Easter's films (cutely avoiding using the director's surname anywhere in the article) and replacing an article about the 1989 Mexican film Love Lies (film) with information about a later film of the same name by Easter. McGeddon (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * FortSunshine: Duck. first edit was to create Stagger (FILM) Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * HenryRoils: Duck. first edit was to create Collateral Consequences (film), and remove speedy tags repeatedly. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Knightrider2015: first edit was to create Paul EGGBERT (Eggy), a Paul Easter bio, and remove speedy tags repeatedly. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * While you're at it, take a look at, who created the page Stagger (FILM), a likely re-creation of Stagger (film). Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Duck-blocked, but not checked yet. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * All ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC) ...including Knightrider2015. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Accounts tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk</b> 17:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

15 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More quacking -- created Paul Easteriner. -- Finngall  talk  08:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * added Meditree who created Paul Easterwood in the familiar style, with a picture matching those of P.Easter on Commons. JohnCD (talk) 15:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked, tagged, pages deleted. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Also blocked Meditree. JohnCD (talk) 15:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * ✅ plus:
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Accounts tagged, closing. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 16:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

17 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More block evasion, creating an article about Paul Zombie "his name (Paul E'aster)" which opens with him railing against being blacklisted by Wikipedia. McGeddon (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged, closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

19 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of Suffolk born Actor Film Maker, like created Suffolk born actor film maker and so on. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm just adding this for posterity and archiving, it's just one of the socks we missed. The account is already blocked. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 21:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

02 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Promoting non-notable filmmaker Paul Easter with barely-rewritten versions of the article deleted last year at Articles for deletion/Paul T T Easter, as per all previous socks. McGeddon (talk) 14:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This is a WP:DUCK sort of situation here. Easter has a pretty big habit of trying to rename articles in order to get around previous saltings and deletions. I wish he'd focus this much energy into getting his films covered because if he approached the film outlets like this, he'd probably have received enough coverage to warrant an entry by now. (Seriously, Ain't It Cool News is usually pretty chill about reviewing stuff.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked, closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Nabbed a sleeper, for future reference. Archiving. Courcelles (talk) 22:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

07 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Yet another SPA sock here to promote non-notable filmmaker Paul Easter at a slightly different disambiguation title to all the salted ones. McGeddon (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Iii30iii has now created Paul Easter (FILMMAKER). --McGeddon (talk) 09:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I really wish that he'd get tired of this. He's not quite at Bambifan01's 500+ sockpuppet amount, but he's on his way towards this, with about 130-150 confirmed and suspected sockpuppets. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * For some reason the title blacklist had  applied as a block on usernames (back in February) rather than article titles, but his socks have always had deliberately unconnected usernames. I requested it be changed to apply to article titles a few days ago, but it's not gone through yet.  --McGeddon (talk) 08:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there a way to apply it to article content? Probably not unless there's a way to block it based on word placement, but it'd nice if that was possible, since he's tried to avoid detection by labeling his articles without his name on it. On a side note, Easter said that this was all a game that he was setting up for a future movie. I for one am disappointed that he hasn't made good on that promise so I could see how he depicts us in film. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The Edit filter accepts requests at WP:EFR. Not sure of the best way to structure such a filter (the name is obscure, but we have an article on an ex-Olympic swimmer with the same name), but they could probably advise. --McGeddon (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I've asked about this and wrote what you put down here. I just see this guy turning into one of those long term abuse people. (sighs) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Both blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

07 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More SPA block evasion, this time creating Paul Easter (UK filmmaker). McGeddon (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Would appreciate any admins with access to the Wikimedia blacklist taking a look at my request to make "Paul Easter" an article-title block; it's currently erroneously set up as a username block. --McGeddon (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Please, indef the sock.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeffed by RHaworth. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

08 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More socking to promote Paul Easter, creating Stagger 2012 (film) and Paul Easter. actor. McGeddon (talk) 09:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked by Samwalton9, tagged by me. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 12:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

08 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of Paul Easter. Director,Actor. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Another one at User:Bbd4458?, creating Paul Easter (film editor). --McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Aaahytr444 and User:0000000lot5000 are tag teaming to repeatedly create and remove speedy templates on P.Easter (film director). --McGeddon (talk) 13:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm adding this IP, given that they made this edit to Lock, Stock..., which is identical to this edit made by 0000000lot5000, a confirmed sock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC) Created PAUL TERRY THOMAS EASTER (actor/writer/producer/director) and others. JohnCD (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The socks are coming fast and furious the past few days. Sleeper check? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I've blocked and will tag the account. Is there a way to find out where he's editing from and block that area? I'm not sure of how this is done. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think there's been any history of sleepers here, he just creates a new account moments before creating the article. Again, it'd be good if an admin could fix the Mediawiki title blacklist to block Paul Easter in article titles rather than usernames (it was erroneously applied to usernames only, by User:Nakon back in February). --McGeddon (talk) 12:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd do it, if I could figure it out. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Request is here. --McGeddon (talk) 12:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I kind of almost hate to salt the entries since it means that he can't hit those specific locations up anymore, but then he's shown that he'll create multiple articles at once. (sighs) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No point in salting, I think, when it's so easy to make up alternate titles. The blacklist in combination with the edit filter means that he'll only be able to write wilfully obscure pseudo-biographies, which will be useless for promotional purposes and get flagged or deleted by any passing editor who chances across them. --McGeddon (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * True, I think at this point I'm more doing it just to see the random titles he comes up with. Seriously though, I really wish he'd find a new hobby or a job or something, as he seems to have far too much idle time on his hands. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Add SHDJASHDH based on Paul East (filmmaker) and P.Thomas Easter (Director/Actor) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked as a WP:DUCK. Four Five articles deleted. Peridon (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged those not already dealt with. JohnCD (talk) 13:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Have since added User:Htyu4, for the record. --McGeddon (talk) 14:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * and Tywwwer23456, dito. JohnCD (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * All the socks are blocked. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

08 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created an article on "Paul East" (probably Paul Easter) Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Already mentioned in the above open SPI case. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Indeffed by Peridon. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

08 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

We've got another one. Pretty ducky in this case. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 17:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Indeffed by NawlinWiki, Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

09 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Still trying to promote Paul Easter despite the new filters, at P.T.T.E. (Filmmaker). McGeddon (talk) 08:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Article written with no Ref to promo or links to film sale sites over 2 weeks ago but was removed as promoting and spaming ?.There are links and refs available to support a page many other pages are live on Wikipedia with far less supporting links and refs.Ken7770 (talk) 08:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you think you can show how Paul Easter meets either WP:ENT or WP:BASIC and want to talk it through, I'm sure any editor would be happy to. You need to request an unblock of your main User:SEFPRODUCTIONS account and have the conversation through that, though. --McGeddon (talk) 08:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The one ref you give is to a newspaper article apparently written by Mr Easter himself. That is not a reliable independent source. Peridon (talk) 08:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked as another WP:DUCK. Somewhere recently I have read a suggestion that the WMF may be willing to take action where the actual person behind persistent long-term abuse like this can be identified. I will try to find it. JohnCD (talk) 09:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

JohnCD Wikipedia is a open resource free for all to edit ediors here need to help not write comments which only add to flair up edit wars etc. Comments written here have been nothing short of libellous past comments now removed after complaints to Wikipedia included (MENTEL ILLNESS). There are many supports of Easter's work and a simple ip check would clearly show that edits are from more than one or two people. The original article had all correct supporting links and references. thanks Lot7000 (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is an open resource but subject to the rules established by its community. It is not for self-promotion, or for playing games like this. The WP:Sockpuppetry policy includes: "A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining.". We do not care whether this campaign of harassment is being carried out by one person or several.


 * It must be clear to you by now that you are getting nowhere. You are simply wasting your time and ours, and have long ago exhausted any sympathy we might have had. If you continue playing silly-buggers, we shall continue to block and delete, and will ask the Wikimedia Foundation whether there is any more direct action they can take to bring this nuisance to an end. If, on the other hand, you want to make progress, what you need to do is:
 * Stop creating new accounts.
 * Make an unblock request from the original account User:SEFPRODUCTIONS, using the Unblock Ticket Request System, since talk page access has been revoked. Read the WP:Guide to appealing blocks first.
 * The request is more likely to be accepted if you:
 * Undertake to use only a single account. (If more than one person is involve, one account per person. The others will also need to request unblock and give the same undertaking).
 * Declare any WP:Conflict of interest in regard to Mr Easter and his productions.
 * Explain why you think Mr Easter meets the WP:Notability standard of WP:CREATIVE.
 * Undertake not to create articles about Mr Easter or his works directly, but to submit drafts through WP:Articles for creation, for review by uninvolved users.
 * JohnCD (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

As you can see no edit as been made from this account it's not connected to Easter. It will not be used to write any article ref, to Easter or his films. However it is in everyones best interest to try and be supportive to people new here" Some have little or no experience editing this platform Sefproductions and Easter started this in the wrong manneragreed but neither will want to re-use old accounts. The recent article had been written by his supporters in Ireland IP check will confirm this the article had no promo links or links where to buy his films.I would very much like to use this account to open a resolution with editors here.I would be happy to submit supporting references and links etc.Lot7000 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * If you read User talk:Paul Easter you will see that a number of people spent some time helping and advising him, although it was clear from the first that he was only here to promote himself and his films, which is explicitly not what Wikipedia is for. However he was unwilling to listen to advice and embarked on this tedious and time-wasting campaign of sock-puppetry. It seems he has said that this is "all a game that he was setting up for a future movie". It sounds like a thoroughly boring movie, but in any case we are not here to play games.


 * Blocks apply to the person, not to the account, and if Easter wants to edit, the only way that will be possible is as I have described above, though on second thoughts he would do better to apply from the User:Paul Easter account, because we do not allow company names as usernames.


 * If you are independent of Easter and want to have a serious go at making an article about him, you should do it through WP:Articles for creation, which will let you submit a draft for review by an experienced user. Do not post an article directly, it will be deleted. First, read WP:CREATIVE and WP:Notability (films) and understand that Wikipedia is selective about article subjects. In all this time I have seen nothing to suggest that Mr Easter or his films are notable in Wikipedia's sense, and if not, you will be wasting your time. References are required that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also WP:Notability (summary). That excludes press releases and articles that consist of him talking about himself, like this local paper piece from the last "article", which counts for nothing because it is all Easter talking about himself, "As my film Black Shuck shows it was far from my first film... " etc. What is needed is substantial comment about him by someone independent. Collect the necessary references, read WP:Your first article for advice, and consider using the WP:Article wizard to guide you through the process. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

The accounts are using mobile IPs. Behavior is going to be pretty much the only thing to go on here. Keegan (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Behaviour is enough to block Ken7770. Lot7000 hasn't done anything blockable yet, and it is possible that s/he is really new and not another sock. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the help and advise. As suggested, after trying to list in draft message displayed as below.

In the draft space. P aul E aster (Directo r/Acto r)

The page title or edit you have tried to create has been restricted to administrators at this time. It matches an entry on the local or global blacklists, which is usually used to prevent vandalism.

If you receive this message when trying to edit, create or move an existing page, follow these instructions:

Any administrator can create or move this page for you. Please post a request at the Administrators' noticeboard. You may also contact any administrator on their talk page or by email. Be sure to specify the exact title (especially by linking it) of the page you are trying to create or edit, and if it might be misunderstood (for example, an article with an unusual name), consider explaining briefly what you want to do. If you wrote any text, save it temporarily on your computer until you can edit the page.

Thank you.

In the draft space. Cant list name here P au l E aste r Blocked!. (D irecto r - A cto r)

Ref. http://explore.bfi Link also blocked! from the (BFI) British Filmm Institute, Main film index full film listing for (B lac k S huc k) E aste r' would have no influence on the BFI's film listings none of E aste r's other films are listed on BFI. E aste r only had one producer credit for a film he worked on until recently on the BFI. Thank you Lot7000 (talk) 08:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Ref BFI, http://explore.bfi.org.uk/558c871c6a486 Thanks Lot7000 (talk) 08:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * you have encountered the defences we have had to erect against Easter and his "game". No one will be willing to dismantle those defences any time soon, because although you may be independent of Easter and behaving reasonably, there is no reason to suppose that, after 18 months and 100+ sockpuppet accounts (over a dozen in the last three days), he is going to stop.
 * I have some ideas about what you can do (collect references to show notability), but let us continue this conversation on your talk page. We are cluttering up this page, which is only about whether Ken7770 and/or you should be blocked as more Easter socks. JohnCD (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Done here, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

03 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Adding one of Easter's films to Black dog ghosts in popular culture, a previous target of Easter socks. Simultaneously uploading another personal photo of Easter to Commons under the same username, at File:Filming for BBC Television in Norfolk United Kingdom.jpg, as previous socks have done. No other edits. McGeddon (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

No other edits will be made Black Shuck, non notable film on own rights for own page but correctly linked to Black Shuck films etc. Still uploaded will not be linked until Easter's 2016 releases become notable --Cardudeusa (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you saying you are a sockpuppet of SEFPRODUCTIONS, but you're just here to make that one edit? --McGeddon (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Why has user Cardudeusa been blocked the edits he or she made were correctly linked to the relevant articles. --WikiSamantha1978 (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I would recommend a WP:DUCK block of based on the fact that their only contribution was the above questioning of this SOCK process.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Same thing happened last month. I've requested that this SPI page be semi-protected again. --McGeddon (talk) 18:29, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

What Wikipedia thinks and can prove are very different things! duck, sockpuppets, it's a joke. Still does not answer why the Black Shuck BFI, listed movie title can not be listed on a Wikipedia sub article page on the very subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSamantha1978 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * and are ✅ to each other.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

18 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Here we go again. Created Easter P. TT (Actor) and P T T E's Black Shuck. JohnCD (talk) 19:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. Checkuser requested to look for sleepers, as this one has been quiet for some time. JohnCD (talk) 19:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * is ✅ to these previously blocked accounts:
 * Adjusted tags accordingly. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Adjusted tags accordingly. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Adjusted tags accordingly. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Adjusted tags accordingly. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

27 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account recently edited at Help_desk, asking for help in getting the pages restored or re-added to Wikipedia. This is somewhat different from the other accounts in that most just try to create the pages rather than ask for help, but given the 150+ sockpuppets I think it's better to err on the side of caution and have this checked to see if it's a sockpuppet. An argument for it being a sock is that they're trying to argue for notability using some of the same sources that previous sockpuppets have used. In any case, if this isn't sockpuppetry then I think that this is likely a case of meatpuppetry, where Easter has asked someone else to try to create a page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I was alerted to this user posting on the help desk board by GermanJoe on my talk page, if anyone's wondering how I came across this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

30 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating another mangled biography of Paul Easter at P.T.T.Easter, and falsely claiming Easter to have been a director on the HBO series Strike Back, on the basis of one Indian film database which seems to have mixed it up with one of Easter's short films of the same title. Previous confirmed sock User:Dav477y was chatting about this TV show and Indian website source on the help desk last week. McGeddon (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged based on behavior. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

18 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Promoting one of Easter's films at Black dog ghosts in popular culture again. Almost the same edit as a previous sock: 1, 2. McGeddon (talk) 16:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * PaulJones2015 tagged and blocked indef per behavioral evidence. Closing case for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

25 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same old same old, this time creating P. Easter. -- Finngall  talk  17:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Behavioral block. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

28 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

creating Suffolk filmmaker. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

User:FURRTTY4866 undid my reversion of User:ResseDSR's plug for Black Shuck movie on Black dog (ghost). I queried the connection on F's talk page before he was blocked and tagged as a sock. Seems a reasonable assumption R is a sock too. Bazj (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

(Fhhgrjghgiu88) Creating Devil Dog Shuck returns (film), another non-notable Paul Easter film. McGeddon (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both accounts have been tagged and blocked indef, closing case for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I merged in 's report (was below) and tagged that sock as well. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

03 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More publicity for P Easter's films, Demon Hound film (2016) Bazj (talk) 22:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

05 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Only edits are creation of P.T.T. director actor Easter and Jake Stag (Film Character), about the film director Paul T T Easter and one of his film characters respectively. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC) NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked as an obvious sock, but I took care of a couple more sleepers after deciding to run a check. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

31 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another SPA account promoting a Paul Easter film (Black Shuck Devil dog) in the same style as all previous socks. McGeddon (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

01 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New account created five minutes after the previous checkuser-confirmed sock's Black Shuck Devil dog article was deleted, to post the same content at Shuck returns Devil dog. McGeddon (talk) 07:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked by CU. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * by CU - True, but I didn't run a check since I just ran one yesterday. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

08 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First edit is to !vote to keep the suspected master's article, Paul Eastman (filmmaker), at AFD:. Accounts were created less than two hours apart. Requesting CU due to suspected vote fraud. GABHello! 13:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * We have another:, sorry to bother you. Thanks, GABHello! 22:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ Sock blocked and master blocked for 3 days. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 21:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * is ✅ to and, which are confirmed socks of SEFPRODUCTIONS. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 22:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

13 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More suspected AFD vote-fraud on the Paul Eastman (filmmaker) article from brand-new accounts:. These may be socks (see last SPI), and I don't know if this case should be merged into that one. Pinging, who dealt with the last case. GABHello! 21:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Having reviewed the article and external links, I think this entire case (including the past one) might be moved to the SEFPRODUCTIONS one. The movies credited to "Eastman" appear to be the same as Easter's films. One sock from the past investigation that was created for vote-fraud at the above AFD was even confirmed to be an SEFPRODUCTIONS sock. Not sure about the other two accounts that were confirmed to one another but not SEFPRODUCTIONS, but I think the behavioral evidence clinches it, and that this is SEFPRODUCTIONS. GABHello! 22:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Added another sock; same thing. GABHello! 11:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
These accounts are ✅ to past SEFPRODUCTIONS socks:
 * - Please, compare those two accounts to the master.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to SEFPRODUCTIONS.
 * This account appear to be :
 * <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 17:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This account appear to be :
 * <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 17:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 17:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

18 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Dannyisdyer 148 just created Found Footage Critic, which is in the same idiosyncratic prose style as other SEFPRODUCTIONS articles and pertains to one of the pet subject areas of this sockdrawer. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/SEFPRODUCTIONS. Julietdeltalima  (talk)  17:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

And user Baskervillet just created Paul Windman, referring to a low-budget Suffolk filmmaker who created "Stagger"; a quick Google search reflects that this is another Paul Easter film, and "Paul Windman" is apparently the latest alternate version of his name to evade filters. Julietdeltalima  (talk)  20:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've just deleted that one and blocked Baskervillet as a sock that quacks loudly. Peridon (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I've just cleaned the Found Footage Critic article up a little, and yes, the original version didn't bother linking to the website's main page and instead had a direct database link to (of all the 500 films apparently on the site) Paul Easter's Devil Dog Shuck Returns. --McGeddon (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * James Night Ray's edits don't seem to overlap at all. It's just tinkering around with Islam-related articles. GABHello! 00:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dannyisdyer148 is ✅, blocked, and tagged.
 * Baskervillet is ❌ but ✅ from . I haven’t blocked James Night Ray because .--Bbb23 (talk) 00:08, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The behavior of Baskervillet and James Night Ray appear to be quite different, so I'm not taking any action. Closing. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 17:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

21 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating another bio of Paul Easter, and an article about his Blood Bath (film). User has made the bizarre decision to refer to Easter as "Simon North" throughout to avoid scrutiny and edit filters, but the sources all refer to Paul Easter and his photo is on both articles.

Also recreated Found Footage Critic, which was speedied yesterday for being created by a confirmed SEFPRODUCTIONS sock. McGeddon (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Seem to be getting real slow 8 live pages still up need to add StaggeR.0 as your filter does not work on that variant lol. SEE YOU ALL TOMORROW................ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junebuggycar (talk • contribs) 17:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Behavioral block. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

21 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User just created Paul Eastsnow (actor), which pictures the presumed actor with "devil dog" Shuckie. The article claims, "lol 70 strong Wiki editors now and growing numbers for 2016.......", so obviously we're feeding the lad's hobby. I'll keep reporting these things as I see them until advised to WP:DENY. Julietdeltalima  (talk)  19:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked by . Closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 22:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

22 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack! Created a page on Paul Easter. GABHello! 17:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked. Tagged, closing. JohnCD (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

22 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created StaggeR.0 (FEATURE FILM) and recreated Paul T.T. East'er (actor). -- Finngall  talk  20:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked. Tagged, closing. JohnCD (talk) 14:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

25 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created Paul East'er T.T. (filmmaker/actor) JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked, tagged, closing. (Sigh. You'd think he'd have something better to do... ) JohnCD (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sems that forgot to close. Closed now.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

10 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:SPA immediately asking for Easter's name to be unblacklisted so that they can write an article because they've found one new source, in very much the same way as previous checkusered socks (cf. 1, 2). They left me a talk page message, somehow knowing that I have been "dealing" with Easter's socks in the past and that "the issue was always no reliable references". McGeddon (talk) 11:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ and blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged. CLosing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

26 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A new Easter sock, this time he created Drive Hard (British film). Of note is that he knew not to add his name into the article, as that would have resulted in it getting deleted on sight rather than taken to AfD. Should we blacklist that title like we have his name? In any case, I've blocked and tagged him, so mostly I just want to make sure that if he's made more accounts that they'll be found. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked the sleeper and tagged both. I'm not closing this because of 's blacklist question.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know about blacklisting, but there is no reason to keep this case open, so I'm closing it.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blacklisting seems premature at this point - this seems to be the first article and only article about this video. --McGeddon (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * My thought was mostly that he'll end up doing the same thing with this that he did with his name and some of the other films. Seriously, the guy needs a hobby that isn't this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blacklisting seems premature at this point - this seems to be the first article and only article about this video. --McGeddon (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * My thought was mostly that he'll end up doing the same thing with this that he did with his name and some of the other films. Seriously, the guy needs a hobby that isn't this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

01 June 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating an article about original sock subject Side Effect Films (UK) and another mangled Easter bio at Paul Terry Thomas East (Side Effect Films). Quack. McGeddon (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious sock is obvious. Blocked and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC) ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First edit was creation of FilmEast (UK), Paul TT Easter's company, with two external links about Devil Dog Shuck. OnionRing (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ and blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Easter is still creating more pages on his own films. CU might help for sleepers, but I don't know. GABgab 16:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am not SEFPRODUCTIONS. I am a Scottish fan of his works, although I think his campaign to get into Wikipedia is doomed to failure. I made these pages solely because I am a fan. I do not even type like him. CheckUser will show my IP to be unrelated. Lottabug (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Both blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Rt777y created a Paul Easter bio at P. E. Terry Thomas, Tomdickharry222 joined in by adding some unsourced birth and career dates which it seems likely that only Easter himself would know. McGeddon (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Tomdickharry222 created Easter .P.T.T a couple of hours later, after the previous article was deleted. --McGeddon (talk) 11:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both are ✅ and blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another Easter sock, this time for the film Hallucination (2016 film). They put the name Paul Terrance down, which is one of Easter's calling cards. I'll block and tag accordingly. Dunno if it'd be worthwhile to do a sweep, probably not since I remember someone here posting that the guy posted a message somewhere asking for people to bombard Wikipedia with pages so a sweep might not catch them all. In any case, he tried saying that the film was directed by Richard Cole, so this might be the next name he tries to use to create articles with. Or Thomas Smith, since he labeled him as a creator in the article as well.

He tried creating some redirects under Paul Terrance (film-writer), Donald Kim (actor), David Ain (actor), Richard Cole (producer), Thomas Smith (Film maker).

I could probably just have bagged and tagged, except I want record of some of the newest names he's using. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck: first edit was to create Paul T.T. Eastman. Wikishovel (talk) 14:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)



First edit was to create Paul T. Eastman. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: white; background: #0066CC; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif"> GILO <span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif"> A& <span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">E&uArr;  16:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

P.J.Easter: Paul T.T. Easter Wikishovel (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Noticed the obvious edit to the master's LTA page yesterday, so adding here for the record. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ and blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

recreation of Easter's biography - this time as Paul Easts. Already blocked and tagged. CU requested as past performance is to create mutiple accounts at a go. Nthep (talk) 17:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Lately, I'm only seeing one account at a time, so CU won't be necessary. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of the now-deleted Paul T T East-er (Actor). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Re-creation of Easter's autobio this time at Paul T. Eastman (Actor/Film Director) Cabayi (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No doubt at all: fits the long time abuse profile perfectly. Blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * is another. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK, created T.T Easter Paul (British filmmaker ) Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, page deleted, and leaving open in case any more turn up today. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Also and . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Tagged and closing. GABgab 01:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious WP:DUCK, created (filmmaker) P.T.East Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Could an admin check this deleted page? Thanks! GABgab 17:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, that's him again. ✅ along with . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of Black Shuck (Film), one of Easter's creations. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
blocked, tagged and article deleted. Nthep (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)