Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saadi babloo/Archive

27 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All these listed users appear to be single-purpose accounts dedicated to the Sajid Mahmood Bhatti article. Shirt58 (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure I've been somewhat of a Muddle-Headed Wombat in incorrectly linking the suspected sock accounts. Possibly fixable? Would appreciate if someone could fix this. A Muddle-Headed Wombat aka --Shirt58 (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You didn't supply any diffs, so judging by the contribution overview only it appears certainly likely that those are just one or two people. However, new users often don't bother to log in, or create a new account, and all without maliciousness. In what way do you think is the behavior inappropriate per WP:ILLEGIT? If the edits made by the above accounts had all been made by one account, would there be cause to block, or only to educate? Amalthea  10:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * - to make it official. Rschen7754 21:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Dropped a note at the filer's talk. --Rschen7754 00:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Context: Sajid Mahmood Bhatti; Articles for deletion/Sajid Mahmood Bhatti
 * For the record:
 * 39.41.71.227
 * added the subject of the article's name in Urdu
 * attempted to directly link the subject of the article's name in Urdu to a non-existent page
 * attempted to link the subject of the article to Notable residents of Gujar Khan
 * added "see also-s" and external links
 * 39.41.135.46 - no issues whatsoever
 * 39.41.185.252
 * Similar pattern of edits
 * 39.41.133.138
 * Added picture of subject of article, active at Notable residents of Gujar Khan
 * 39.41.60.241
 * blanked the AfD
 * Removed AfD notice
 * Muhammad Anees Bhatti
 * BLPPROD removed
 * Facebook link added
 * And so on.
 * I was minded to drop this whole SPI, following Amalthea's wise comments ^above. I ask, with a heavy heart, that it be continued. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * So how does this relate to the alleged master? --Rschen7754 04:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * It's not really a violation of WP:ILLEGIT to edit while logged out. Most of the disruptive edits are just those of a confused newbie. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)