Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saakaryadav/Archive

04 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts are relatively new and are concurrently making edits to a single article, NJRS, without using the talk page to communicate. Additionally, I feel like this account is just to avoid a potential block on the sockmaster's main account because he has been warned 4 times about removing speedy deletion templates (and thus would be blocked the next time he did it) and wanted to make the fifth removal look like it was done by someone else. Gparyani (talk) 05:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The following are ✅:
 * There are also serious indications of terms of use breaches from this review. This should be borne in mind when reviewing the edits of these accounts.  Risker (talk) 17:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * All blocked indef and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There are also serious indications of terms of use breaches from this review. This should be borne in mind when reviewing the edits of these accounts.  Risker (talk) 17:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * All blocked indef and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * All blocked indef and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)