Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadlyraft/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All are SPA's involved in hijacking of Metioche (disambiguation) to promote Meridian Gaming Ltd, an article 'Mili chica' (re)created, after the hijacking had failed. The article is in the process of getting deleted and salted and suspicions arose there. See Articles for deletion/Meridian Gaming Ltd. Before creating the article in question, 'Mili chica' inserted the company website (definitely not WP:RS) as a reference for a statement about one of the company's products. Kleuske (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

The history section and other parts of Meridian Gaming Ltd (by 'Mili chica') were copied verbatim from User:Sadlyraft/sandbox.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Everything else is, but could we compare Mili chica with Alexdjix89? Please block Mili chica and Alexdjix89, the behavioral evidence is obvious. Thanks very much, GABgab 00:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason why those accounts couldn't be blocked based on behavioral evidence?--Bbb23 (talk) 01:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I've changed the case status accordingly. Thanks, GABgab 01:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. Have you done the behavioral analysis and satisfied yourself the blocks are warranted (I didn't, I was just asking you because you didn't explain the reason for the CU endorsement)?--Bbb23 (talk) 01:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It certainly appears that (at least) these two accounts are involved in promoting the same company; the others are too old to block. Alexdjix89 attempted page hijacking, while Mili chica linked to the company's products and created the promotional article. Moreover, that latter diff's edit summary is very indicative of socking: "Rebuilding of the Meridian Gaming Ltd page." Of course, to go about "rebuilding" an article, it must have been deleted in the past. Given that I can't see that either of these two accounts ever created the page before this instance, that suggests that they tried in the past with another account. GABgab 02:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I blocked the two accounts without tags. You can still tag however you wish, or not. In the meantime, I'm closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)