Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sakura emad/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

On August 18, 2021, Sakura emad said that she would stop all activities on Wikipedia and learn more about Wikipedia policies before continuing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sakura_emad&action=history

Subsequently, on August 19, Anonymous gay.fairy added plagiarized "information" to the Testosterone article under the heading "Testosterone - For People on the Non-Binary Spectrum. & Women." https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Testosterone&type=revision&diff=1039586585&oldid=1039476616

This added "information" (including the heading!) had grammar errors similar to Sakura emad's grammar errors in other areas, including the article about Transgender. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transgender&type=revision&diff=1039312602&oldid=1038684862

on January 20, 2020 After Joe biden becomes President[129][130] President Joe Biden signs an executive order for lifting the transgender military ban[131][132], that have been previously banned by President Donald Trump[124][125][126] And he Officially Declares that he supports Transgender People "Your president has your back"[133] 

I reverted Anonymous gay.fairy's additions to the Testosterone article, and Sakura emad immediately went to Oshwah's Talk Page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Oshwah#Learning_and_asking ) to ask about my Revert. She seeks affirmation that the additions weren't vandalism, but they are in terms of exceeding the scope of the article, in terms of poor sourcing, in terms of plagiarism, and in terms of spam (the "sources" had advertising links). (By the way, Sakura emad had already tried to add an unneeded "source" to the Testosterone page, so there's clearly a pattern of behavior.)

Please investigate. Thank you. 136.49.32.166 (talk) 21:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Also wanted to add that this person does not seem to understand the concept of citation overkill. She'll add "references" to almost every noun/proper noun, including the first mention of those words in articles that are about those very words. This pattern of behavior appears in the Transgender and the Testosterone articles but can be seen elsewhere as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pinoyscincus_abdictus&type=revision&diff=1039381430&oldid=1010017340 136.49.32.166 (talk) 22:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Commenting here solely to report for easy visibility that this page was moved from  to   per an edit request  from the reporting IP user. I have also removed said request in this edit. If I have caused any inconvenience due to a lack of knowledge regarding SPI's, please let me know, and I apologize. Cheers! — Sirdog9002 (talk) 22:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I see absolutely zero hard evidence here of sock puppetry–it is all very vague. I don't find both users making grammatical errors to be convincing at all. They would have to make the exact same error, multiple times, for me to be convinced that it's the same person. Everyone makes grammatical errors. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  22:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but different people don't make the same types of errors. That's how you identify someone's signature, how they do something consistently. 136.49.32.166 (talk) 22:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * See the discussion started on my user talk page here (permalink). I already explained to this user that their accusations and the evidence he/she provided was insufficient...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I can only echo what others have already said about this report being woefully lacking evidence. Closing without action. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)