Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Salim567/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:JohnsonCherryium9 (blocked) is linked to User:Salim567 (blocked) already. User:Hallycom (blocked) was clearly User:Andrew Logan Martin (blocked). I believe they all are the same person, and are also the new editor, User:HarryRobertHR.

Checkblock requested to clear out any remaining socks. Salim567 is the oldest (known) account, so I'm listing him as the puppetmaster. If it isn't and this needs to be moved to another name, my apologies.

Sock JohnsonCherryium9 didn't do much in article space, so only listing him as he was linked to Salim already.

All these users (minus Johnson) have a history of editing on the same focus of Islam type pages.

Most (not Andrew) have a history of making pointless userpage edits, (typically +1 bit edits) to their user pages to increase their edit counts to make it to Autoconfirmed status before editing in Semiprotected pages. Salim, Hallycom, HarryRobertHR Salim went further to Extended confirmed, but also had a longer account life.

All (except Harry and Johnson) edited Muhammad and the Bible; it was PP-Sock after Hallycom was blocked and before Harry got around to it. These three accounts made the same large identical edit: Andrew, Halley and Salim (barring a few spacing changes)

Hallycom and Harry made near identical edits (Hallycom, Harry) to Islam, and both made the same reference to looking at past versions of the page on the wayback machine, not the Wikipedia page history, in the edit summary.

Salim made this edit to Black Stone, then Harry made the same edit but adding a source later on.

Nearly identical edits to Jihad by Salim and Harry (Harry's cite used more parameters, but same statement and source added)

Both Salim and Andrew edited the redirect page La ilaha illallah, adding and rephrasing the same addition. No identical edits to diff in this, as Salim's March edits were never removed until after Andrew was blocked July 2nd, but not a whole lot of edits to look through here.

Table for clearer article connections between accounts if you prefer:

I'm formally making this investigation just to clear up and find any remaining socks still on the loose and to have Wikipedia confirm for certain that it's the same socker. Also, to have some collective evidence to compare to and check for if there are future suspected socks. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:56, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to one another:
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)