Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Salmanlla/Archive

04 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

threatened to make personal attacks using multiple accounts 1

Restored the personal attack immediately after was blocked. 2 Chamith   (talk)  13:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Kallakanija admitted here that U:Salmanlla was created by the same editor. This edit shows that is also a part of the socking. The same problem with :. JimRenge (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Kallakanija once again stated that he will continue to disrupt (possibly) the project using his alternative account(s). It seems like he has created prodigious amount of accounts to fulfill his desperate needs. speculated that Kallakanija might also be sockpuppetting as .-- Chamith   (talk)  07:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The Wesige putha account was renamed JanStovicek. JimRenge (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * King of Hearts - I think this edit is just enough to confirm that was created by Kallakanija, yet used by the same person. --  Chamith   (talk)  15:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * is technically . There's very little data (only one non-stale edit). Besides the restoration of the personal attack, the other behavioral evidence should be analyzed.
 * I’ve indefinitely blocked the two confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Not enough evidence to declare Salmanlla a sockmaster - they could have just been a third party who believed the personal attack should not have been removed. I can't discern any similarity from the other edits. Any other opinions? King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You should really be directing your comments to who asked for input from others. That said, I think the link you posted (15:37, 6 September 2015) is helpful.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Warned Salmanlla. (Blocking indef on the first time is too much, while blocking for a period of time is pointless as significant time has passed since the last violation.) Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You should really be directing your comments to who asked for input from others. That said, I think the link you posted (15:37, 6 September 2015) is helpful.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Warned Salmanlla. (Blocking indef on the first time is too much, while blocking for a period of time is pointless as significant time has passed since the last violation.) Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)