Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sameer Arpitaqwe/Archive

15 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Note, not sure who is the master here. Very recently in WikiProject Indian Noticeboard we discussed on paid editing in Indian articles. That issue remained unsolved, but a number of articles were semi-protected. I have a doubt that in this article too either paid editing or CoI editing is going on. I posted about it in the article's talk page. Another editor told he also thinks so. The issue is brief: a number of new accounts are editing this articles. The IPs are worse, but, I have not included IPs to keep this report short. They are pushing PoV and writing like advertisement. Example. Can someone check socks in this article? In addition, is it possible to check locations (I am not asking to disclose locations here) of the IPs and if they are known IP address of any known IPs (like IPs used by any company, office, particular location). Tito ☸ Dutta 06:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I don't know about the other accounts, but I am 100% sure that Taradhoni's master is Sanjeetbond as both the accounts have strikingly similar editing style. See my comment here. Plea$ant 1623  ✉  08:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * As per above, I also confirm that Taradhoni is a sockpuppet of sockmaster Sanjeetbond. Thanks. Fideliosr (talk) 03:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Satyashiva where Taradhoni is confirmed as a sock. If you have evidence that this is a particular master, please present it there. It may help us resolve this. Cheers,

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I ran a couple checks on a couple users who were engaging in the most spammy and similar editing, and none of them were related. Most of these have not been checked due to insufficient evidence. Closing, then, since this likely isn't sockpuppetry. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)