Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanjeetbond/Archive

13 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Its difficult to be 100% sure but he has always been engaged in edit warring regarding bollywood films and always refuse to listen or cooperate.Moreover the article here Son of Sardaar (soundtrack) was created by the suspected sockpuppet i mentioned.Please give a look unless he will spoil many more. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 08:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Aamir21 is fighting for the same article Son of Sardaar (soundtrack) as it is created by his another sockpuppet User:Ghajinidetails. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * This report was originally filed with Ghajinidetails as the suspected sockmaster and Filmonline111 as a suspected sock. Since Ghajinidetails is already established as one of several sockpuppets of Sanjeetbond, I have moved it. Investigating the respective editing histories, I found that this is a complete WP:DUCK case, for reasons I will not specify for WP:BEANS reasons. (The user has already learnt to avoid some of the give-away features of earlier socks.) I also discovered that User:Amitabh2 is another sock of the same master. I have blocked Filmonline111 & Amitabh2 indefinitely. However, in view of the editor's history of sockpuppetry, a check user for sleepers or other yet undiscovered socks would be welcome. It is worth mentioning that the account Filmonline111 was created while Ghajinidetails was in use, but not used until Ghajinidetails was blocked, so sleepers are entirely likely. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Aamir21 is technically on technical behaviour alone; but sock sweeps are impossible on that ISP (or, more precisely, they are possible but worthless).  &mdash; Coren (talk) 00:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocking, tagging and closing.

07 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

It's very rare for a user to create account and spoil articles with a vast edit summaries and make big changes in hurry as i suspect his style of editting.He claims to be in United states but if He belong to India i am 100% sure he is a sockpuppet. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 10:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Renamed from Filmonline111. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * - The extra tools aren't necessary to see the sockpuppetry here. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Obvious sock blocked and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

09 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Writting style clearly a evidence and fighting for the same reasons again and again despite being blocked more than 5-6 times. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes Sir,this is my job and i have been doing it from some time ,not only from now just for Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan.I have been facing them so i know just from their writting style and contributions in common articles.I am not fighting there but only discussing for the right thing. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I withdrew this request as of now until came back with strong case if needed.Sorry. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 09:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing will be done here until you provide diffs to demonstrate the similarity. This is your job and no one else will do it. I sincerely hope this isn't another case of you filing an SPI against anyone who disagrees with you at Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 18:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Closed. Filer has retracted the accusation. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

19 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user User:Besharamsun was blocked here and next day he created this account  and started doing editing in the same tone and start spoiling articles most of the times.Just after creation,there was some disagreement for which he used two accounts  and  to show  that users agree with him.He created more than ten accounts in the past(archieves) and still refuse to cooperate with anyone.I request checkuser this time because i have little differences although the editing style and type of articles are familier and i am 100% sure about him. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 00:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Moved to correct master. Rschen7754 09:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Noting similar edit summaries both in content and style. Same articles edited. So I feel comfortable...
 * - this. Rschen7754 09:37, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. T. Canens (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Tagged and bagged; closing. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 13:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

21 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Hello,the user here is a sockpuppet of these accounts and i am 100% sure about this because i have been facing him frequently.Apart from spamming and copyright violation,He have been doing poor editing countinously and make work tedious for others.Every user has right to edit even after being blocked but his intentions are problematic as he do not listen to others.Another proof is and ,his contributions in same tone. ---zeeyanketu discutez 20:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Seems likely based on the common editing interests and similarly worded edit summaries, as well as the fact that one account began editing the day after the other was blocked. Most damning is the identical modus operandi for copyvios:  most contributions consist of sentences copied and pasted from the sources. We'll probably have to add all the previous socks' contributions to Contributor copyright investigations/Snigdhasinghsweet now—&lt;sigh&gt; —Psychonaut (talk) 10:27, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This case was originally filed under Abhinavname, but has been moved here. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * - Snig was created a day after the previous sock,, was blocked, and has managed to edit many of the same articles. Requesting CU to confirm the connection. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus and another possible account, which another CU may want to have a look at. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There may be sleepers, but owing to the nature of their ISP, we probably won't know until after they edit. Naturally, no rangeblock will be possible. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * New socks blocked and tagged. Nothing more to do. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)