Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti/Archive

08 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Suspected sockmaster created Oasis Academy School, which has been tagged for speedy deletion per WP:G5. That editor has already been banned based on CheckUser evidence. The .75 IP's only edits have been to that article, including removing the speedy deletion tag. The .37 IP has a longer edit history, which most recently includes creating the article talk page with the text "It is an Official Page. Please don't remove this page." Beebek bhurtel's only edit is also to the talk page, also contesting deletion. —me_and 11:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

I've just added Sarojupreti and Bibekbhurtel5 to the list. Both are already blocked (Sarojupreti seems to have been deemed the sockmaster of them all), but I'm including Bibekbhurtel5 as I think that makes it more obvious that Beebek bhurtel is also a sock. For more evidence, see the edit history of Shree Harikul Model Higher Secondary School (e.g. by Beebek Bhurtel, by Bibekbhurtel5, by Sarojupreti132). —me_and 14:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Removing the CheckUser request – I think the similar usernames and edit histories are sufficient evidence without CU. —me_and 15:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
New account ✅, blocked, tagged, and closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

12 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Past socks include User:Bibekbhurtel5 and User:Beebek bhurtel: User:Beebek62 says on his user page "Hello,I am bibek bhurtel". Beebek62 has mostly been working on a hoax-ish article about a soccer videogame, but took an odd break to add an invalid AfD template to a Sarojupreti sock's Dreams (2016 film) article a few days ago. Beebek62 joined Wikipedia the day after User:Beebek bhurtel was blocked.McGeddon (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

08 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

gives the users name as "Saroj Upreti", with the obvious link to the sockmaster's username. This account and previous accounts have all edited Shree Harikul (e.g. FB's edits:, previous account edits: ). —me_and 16:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, this account first edited on 20 February, most recent blocked sock was blocked on 12 February. —me_and 16:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ducky, per this version of his user page, where he identifies as Saroj Upreti and says he hails from Nepal. He did this before as Fighterman Baadshah here. I can block him on duck, but I think it might be worth a CU if only to refresh the CU data on him. The last case we had in the archive was from March. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've blocked the account as is. There haven't been any additional accounts in the previous checks, so a sleeper check isn't needed. Mike V • Talk 18:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Dangerous Khiladi 5 and User:Bollywood Nude both added the near-identical line "This film is a remake of the 2013 malayalam film Mumbai Police" to Dishoom on the 16th and 17th of June (1, 2), Bollywood Nude repeating the lowercase but failing to pipe the link.

A day after Khiladi was blocked as a sockpuppet of Sarojupreti, Bollywood Nude pinged a bunch of admins accusing the apparently unrelated editor of being a Sarojupreti sock, and posted a fake blocked-as-a-sockpuppet template on Nepali's user page.

Requesting a sweep for sleeper accounts, since Bollywood Nude has been active since March. McGeddon (talk) 09:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I support you. Bollywood Nude is really a sockpuppet of Dangerous Khiladi 5. He is trying to make me his sockpuppet too just because I kept a photo uploded by him under discussion and that photo was deleted too. So he just wants to revenge me.  Nepali Keto 62 Talk to me 10:44, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Two new editors who have been active at Shree Harikul Model Higher Secondary School and have asked identical questions at the Teahouse (compare this and this). MasterPiece2016 has attempted to impersonate, which is behaviour we've seen in previous investigations. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * More evidence at Teahouse/Questions. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * He confesses that he has two accounts here; is this just an attempt at involving Nepoli in a socking investigation? Muffled Pocketed  13:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's interesting that Tiger Gang's user page uses the same design as Nepali keto62's. The latter is called Bibek according to their user page, and that is the name of a previous sock. This could all be an attempt to implicate an innocent user, of course. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Although was blocked before Nepali keto62 started editing. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yep: and see here! Muffled Pocketed  13:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * User:Nepali keto62, according to their userpage, is from Jhapa, Nepal, and attends Shree Harikul Model Higher Secondary School. User:Tiger Gang, according to their userpage, is from Jhapa, Nepal, and attends Shree Harikul School. User:MasterPiece2016 has been asking how to review new articles, and User:Tiger Gang has been asking how to review new articles (see also here, and note that their Teahouse question came days after I'd recommended they stop reviewing new articles). That's a very clear connection between those three accounts, whether they're kids all in the same class at school or just one person socking. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, at Teahouse/Questions, User:Tiger Gang denies any connection with User:MasterPiece2016, which does not appear credible. Whoever they are, I'd say we have blatant dishonesty and deception of some sort here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, though an important question is whether Nepali keto62 is involved in that dishonesty and deception, or is innocent despite the links. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please listen me. I will tell you guys the truth. User:Tiger Gang is my schoolmate. So he is always against me. He is also angry because I have more contribution than him in wikipedia. I promise he is not my suckpocket.  Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  14:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What can you tell us about User:MasterPiece2016? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I am 100% sure User:MasterPiece2016 is also his sock. He is just trying to destroy my carrier as wikipedian. Please help me.  Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  14:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Blocked sock User:Bibekbhurtel5 ties sockmaster Sarojupreti to Jhapa, Nepal (as do several other socks), and to Shree Harikul school too, as per this version of their user page, and thus connects to User:Nepali keto62 and User:Tiger Gang. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please understand I am not sockpuppet of User:Sarojupreti. And there are no any proofs about this matter.  Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  16:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm just saying that the school and geographic location connect all of these accounts, not necessarily that everyone is a sock of Sarojupreti. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

I just added two more potential socks, Abhishek Jha Nepal and BaralSir. They are both single-purpose accounts active on a related AfD, Articles for deletion/Anil Jha, about the principal of the school. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * doesn't seem to have edited Articles for deletion/Anil Jha, . Cordless Larry (talk) 21:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I think the connection comes from this edit on the talk page of WikiProject Nepal and the fact that this was their first edit, and their account was created (contrary to what they say on their user page) just today. Uanfala (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, got it. I now also see that that comment has been quoted in the AfD. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Adhering to the policies and guidelines set forth by Wikipedia, I completely deny any association with the user BaralSir. As a sensible user, I understand the consequences sockpuppetry has and moreover, I respect the community trust guidelines of Wikipedia. Abhishek Jha Nepal (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * As to the his comment on Wikiproject Nepal pages being his first edit, I presume it was because he claims to be an expert in Nepal related pages, so Wikiproject Nepal might have been the first thing to enter his mind. Abhishek Jha Nepal (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

yes, we are from the same school but we are not sockpuppet. MasterPiece2016 is creating multiple account and he is trying to humiliate me and because he isn't more success in wikipedia. So Please help us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiger Gang (talk • contribs) 02:39, 17 July 2016‎ (UTC)
 * If you want help to not get banned I would offer s advice at the Teahouse. Wikipedia isn't a competition to win against each other. It also seems that someone maybe lying about MasterPiece2016 (Tiger and Nepali).  A dog 104  Talk to me 15:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If an editor is creating multiple accounts, then they are sockpuppets. In any case, what is clear is that these editors are trying to have fun at the expense of Wikipedia and to cause confusion.  On the one hand, administrators do not block editors as sockpuppets without reasonable evidence that they really are the same person.  However, administrators do block editors for being not here to build or maintain the encyclopedia.  My advice is already stated.  Stop all of the game-playing.  Take a break from editing at all in order to get over the game-playing mood.  Then figure out how to support the encyclopedia collaboratively, and listen to experienced advice.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I am not playing any game in wikipedia and I don't know any thing about User:MasterPiece2016. Please keep in mind all the works are done by MasterPiece2016 like using my sign,violating others etc buy not me and I don't want to listen anything more now.— Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  01:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * In, Nepali keto62 said "I withdraw my nomination", on a nomination made by Tiger Gang. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh! That edit? I was just trying to remove that article from deletion policy because no new comments were made by other users neither it is deleted from last 3 or 4 days. Now I got that nobody can withdraw the article from deletion policy expect the nominator Is it true? Sorry for the trouble.— Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  08:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because no one commented in the discussion for more than 3 days or more doesn't mean s that you should close the discussion as you have tried to it as withdrawal.  Ayub 407 talk 08:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * To be fair, they didn't actually say "I withdraw my nomination", they said "". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * And they didn't see what gets transcluded from that template? David Biddulph (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've no idea. I'm just pointing out what the specific edit they made actually was, as I think it is important to be accurate here. Had they actually entered the text "I withdraw my nomination", I'd say it would have been significantly more damning than adding a template that transcluded the text. Boing! said Zebedee (talk)


 * I want to note that Nepali keto and Tiger Gang (as per this diff have close to the same spelling and grammar mistakes. However, Abhishek has a different spelling. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Given that attempted to impersonate, let's not rule out that  might be trying to mimic Nepali keto62's spelling and grammar. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * and seem to be exhibiting quite similar editing behaviour today, for example creating lots of user sub-pages, "guestbooks", etc. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess they were copying each other. They are young editors after all. Ayub 407 talk
 * If you check their user page history, you do see a lot of similarities, but not exact...Examples:
 * July 7, 2016 – Nepali 06:28 / Tiger 12:30.
 * July 7, 2016 – Nepali 20:36 / Tiger 21:51.
 * July 11/14, 2016 – Nepali 21:37 / Tiger 21:14.  A dog 104  Talk to me 18:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * They both also remove contents which are warnings from their talk page.
 * 19 July 2016:- User:Tiger Gang and User:Nepali keto62 Ayub 407 talk 19:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There not looking sock puppets, but maybe it has a close relation between them.— $Constanstin$ 08:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * How do you know that they are not sockpuppets,, or is that just your opinion? Cordless Larry (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Cordless Larry, it's just my opinion about Nepali keto62, and i have no idea about others.— $Constanstin$ 09:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I kind of share the same opinion with at this point; if they're not sockpuppets (emphases on the if), they seem to be definitely related to each other to what we've seen so far (basing this off their age, school, location from here: Nepali and Tiger as I'm seeing as they could be classmates). And as McClenon has said above, stop playing games  — . Accusing each other of being sockpuppets doesn't help, Tiger and Nepali and please find a way to support Wikipedia collaboratively rather than being uncivil to each other.  A dog 104  Talk to me 14:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay sir. And actually I was not doing any such works at first but Tiger Gang did in talk of several users. Forgive me and thanks for your advice. Now I will not do such business neither will talk with Tiger Gang.— Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  15:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Please block since it was created by Nepali keto62. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 16:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Is somebody attempting to impersonate me? -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I suspect that it is a coincidence,, although impersonation was a feature of this case, so you never know. The 62 comes from (and ). Cordless Larry (talk) 07:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Arbitrary break
 * looks awfully suspicious as well here. Created in May 2016, he's been heavily involved with these socks from the start. There's way too much cross-over to be a coincidence.
 * Signed Nepali's guestbook:
 * Nominated some of the sock's userboxes for deletion: here. Note that Tiger Gang nominated a sock's page for deletion as well, so this user has been known to conflict with themselves.
 * Created the sockpuppet investigation on Nepali with regard to his bot at Sockpuppet investigations/Nepali keto62. Done only six hours after the bot was created.
 * Has a similarly over-complicated userpage that relies on many subpages in his own userspace, similar to other confirmed socks. I fail to see how even the most competent editor could create that userpage shortly after joining.
 * Created a guestbook similar to other socks, which was signed by multiple confirmed socks. This includes creating a barnstar to award to those who signed his guestbook, same as the other socks.
 * Both expressed a desire to control a bot despite not having programming skills. This is the most damning thing for me, since it's highly unusual for users to find their way to bot requests and request someone make a bot for them to operate. See.
 * I think this needs CU. ~ Rob 13 Talk 18:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I also just noticed User:VarunFEB2003/GuestbookBarnstar was created by Tiger Gang. The behavioral evidence will need evaluating here. I'm quite surprised that these were unrelated given all this cross-over. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Looking further, I also found that VarunFEB2003 participated at Articles for deletion/Eden English School Btl, an AfD for a page edited by Nepali. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * IP address
 * I came across this IP address who edited Tiger Gang userpage by adding biographical information about him. and .  Ayub 407 talk 18:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is a very messy case technically. Many of the ranges are impossible to check because the account activity is too great.
 * With that in mind, the following accounts are ✅:
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other and to the above accounts:
 * Blocked and tagged the first set of accounts, and blocked without tags the second set.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Red Rose62 is ✅, blocked, and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * VarunFEB2003 is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged the first set of accounts, and blocked without tags the second set.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Red Rose62 is ✅, blocked, and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * VarunFEB2003 is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Red Rose62 is ✅, blocked, and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * VarunFEB2003 is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much. After advice from Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi I never talked to NEpali after I understood I was biting him. I have nominated a user sub page created by Tiger Gang without adequate info for speedy deletion. Thank you all and Regards VarunFEB2003 (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Please note that the range 49.126.254.0/24 has been blocked for a week and is probably related to this SPI based on their edits and geolocation. ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving second group without tags. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The hunter boy appeared immediately after the blocking of Tiger Gang and Nepali keto62. User talk:The hunter boy/Editnotice says that he is from Jhapa, as for the others, and he has the same obsession with presentation of his user pages and subpages (and signature), rather than doing anything to improve the encyclopedia. Seems to be quacking loudly. David Biddulph (talk) 10:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Looks pretty certain to me. Has the same type of unusual signature as, with that crosshair mouse pointer feature. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * As per Cordless Larry, . Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm inclined to block this as a duck what with that crazy signature and all but I'm going to wait for to pull the other socks out of the draw first. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I was going through user creation log, and I came across . The reason why I suspect him as a sock puppet of Tiger Gang is because of the similarities of their user page. This is Rishi Singh Rathod's user page, and this is Tiger Gang's userpage before being blocked. Similar? It Seems he is block evading by saying that he is from India. Ayub 407 talk 12:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * His contributions shows him editing only on his userspace. Created guestbook, templates, etc... Seems also like a duck. Ayub 407 talk 12:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Ayub bro I am not his sockpuppet. How can you say that i am his sockpuppet? Rishi Singh Rathod (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I am copying this user page from . He may also copied from him.Rishi Singh Rathod (talk) 12:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * At first i will finished my guestbook,userpage and talk page and forward to contributions. Rishi Singh Rathod (talk) 12:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The account hasn't been used in some time, but looks to be a sock, judging by the name similarity with . Cordless Larry (talk) 14:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This is another sock created after yesterday's blocks. Likely more in the draw, so bringing here. I got informed because of this reinsertion of Tiger Gang's edit. Then there's also the usual social networking stuff like User:Bahaddur/Service_Awards and this. Anyone else can feel free to Duck block, but I'm leaving it open for a CU to pull out the other socks. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. No other accounts seen. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Translation of the username by Google translate shows that its Saroj Upreti. Also added wikiproject Nepal on its userpage. Seems to be a duck. Ayub 407 talk 13:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

In addition, the user is requesting barnstars, similar to how Tiger Gang and Nepali keto62 valued them greatly. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ayub 407 talk 13:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * They're also using dates as headings on user talk pages, like Tiger Gang did. Maybe they picked that up from the format of this page! Cordless Larry (talk) 13:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I have a conspiracy theory... that User:Jimbo is the sockmaster of everyone! Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * ...and now they have admitted that they are a sock of Sarojupreti. --bonadea contributions talk 13:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Is there any way to tell the user that if he wants to be unblocked (which is a extremely small chance now), he should go to WP:UTRS? Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You can post it on his orignal talkpage. But WP:UTRS will be completely useless now becuase of multiple accounts creation in a short peroid of time. Perhaps a standard offer should would be a good idea if he is willing to contribute the encyclopedia constructively. Ayub 407 talk 13:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * As per Cordless Larry, i also noticed this nearly 30 or 40 minutes ago. On other hand, this (maybe) a goodfaith editor, continesly asking for help. Look at his my talk page.— Constanstin 13:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar User Pages, similar low-level disruption. Muffled Pocketed  11:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

It seems to me that Nepalirider123 is unrelated to Sarojupreti but actually User:Adamsmith ? Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Those barnstars? Undoubtedly; but in that case, I still think Adamsmith is someone else- just can't place it... Muffled <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  12:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Here is my SPI case regarding Rajusharmaofc (username now changed to Adamsmith). Ayub 407 talk 12:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Non-admin comment: Another sock, Silent Hunter blocked. Total, 28 accounts created by Sarojupreti. This is crazy. Ayub 407 talk 16:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't know why this user is creating so many accounts, i reviewed the user page of Silent Hunter, and then Silent Hunter left barnstar in my user talk (for reviewing their pages). And when i clicked (at username) in his signature, i saw Silent Hunter tagged (blocked) as another sock of Sarojupreti.— Constanstin 16:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I already found that Nepalirider123 is ❌ to Rajusharmaofc. Nepalirider123 is also ❌ to Sarojupreti. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user was registered today, and please note the similarity of name: Nepali Writer, Nepali keto62, etc. — Constanstin 06:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note WP:CSD. Cheers! <sub style="color:green;>Muffled <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  10:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, but User:Nepali Writer is not yet blocked.— Constanstin 12:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Didn't make a diference bro. Nuked. <sub style="color:green;>Muffled <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  17:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Content Provider Nepal That's.... creative.. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other and ❌ to Sarojupreti:
 * Blocked. Ajeya Raj Sumargi is the oldest account of the three.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged this group separately. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Ajeya Raj Sumargi is the oldest account of the three.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged this group separately. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged this group separately. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I came across this user and I have been watching it for a month. The more the user edits, the more my suspicions rises that this user could be a sock of Sarojupreti because of the same editing patterns of Tiger Gang. I'm listing below the evidences. These are the behavioural evidences. I am requesting a checkuser to verify technical evidences. Ayub 407 talk 08:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The username are similar to each other. The word Upreti is used in both usernames.
 * Has been editing it's userpage and adding contents like navigation boxes, just like Nepali keto62 & Tiger Gang did before. When the user created it's milestones userspace template added to it's userpage, that raised my suspicion even more that this could be a sock.
 * The user has be editing articles which were edited by Tiger Gang before.
 * 1) edited Dance Plus (season 2)  which was created by Tiger Gang and was also edited by another sock Nepali Bibek.
 * 2) edited Dance Plus    which edited by Tiger Gang before.
 * 3) heavily edited Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa (season 9)  which was edited by Tiger Gang a month back..

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Okay, while Hell Rider didn't edit much here, but contributed a lot at Nepali Wikipedia. The userpge of Hell Rider at Nepali Wikipedia is similar to Nepali Bibek here. A simple google translate of the userpage at Nepali wikipedia shows that both users were born in 11 March 2001, from Jhapa and lives in Shivasatakshi Municipality. Clearly a duck over there but block evading here. Also, just like the other socks, Tiger Gang [diff2] and Nepali Bibek [diff3], Hell Rider also interacted with VarunFEB2003. Ayub 407 talk 09:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Hell Rider edited Chhota Bheem and the Shinobi Secret, which was last edited another sock Nepali Bibek. . Ayub 407 talk 09:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Blocked and tagged. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 15:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious sock, has Upreti in his name and interacted with VarunFEB2003 Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blatant sock blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of Lalit Bisht previously created by SRZA002. The suspected sock is only here to promote Lalit Bisht and his work (Jeet Lengey Jahaan). Please see deleted contributions of and. Thank you. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS (talk |c|em ) 16:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry actually, I was not aware of the redirect which SRZA002 created in the past, so this looks more like an autobiography which the subject trying to create since 2012 when their first film was released. Laletbist was registered in 2016 and created Lalet Bist (Lalit M S Bisht) which connects them. The reason for including Lalitbisht22 was the creation of Lalit bisht but, I just looked at of Lalitbisht22 userpage which I missed yesterday and found them unrelated due to their different birth date so I think his case can be moved to Lalitmsbisht as the master if possible. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS  (talk |c|em ) 05:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - This is going to need more evidence. SRZA002's creation of Lalit Bisht was a redirect, so that doesn't tell us much, and a connection between the two stale accounts and this case has not been previously established. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If there's no longer a suspected connection to Sarojupreti, I'm just going to close this outright. The sockpuppetry concerns among the three accounts reported here are stale, since the most recent edit from what would be an alternate account if they are one person was about two and a half year ago. Concerns over autobiographies are better reported at WP:COIN. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)